WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.2K

It's simple in hindsight. We can ride the middle and gain zero traction, with a no-platformed message about how we're "all the same", again, message supressed, or worse, have some state sponsored false flag to set us back to square one when we do gain any traction on the middleground of 'unity' 'us against the state/media/banks/etc'.

OR, we can push hard in the opposite direction through hatred. Their attempts to divide us are like snow on a mountain. They count on time to evaporate interest like they count on the sun to melt snow. But if we pile on enough hate, well that little bit of snow, combine with all the hate they put out there, turns into an unstoppable boulder picking up momentum that they didn't anticipate or account for. It actually allows us to solidify around a single issue, THE ONE ISSUE that they absolutely DONT want us unified on: preventing the replacement of europeans, and our general survival as a people.

The strength of the blitz in world war 2, as a tactic, was that it was sudden and fierce. It seemed unstoppable, like it would always work and the allies were powerless against it. It was only defeated when the achilles heel of the blitzkreig was found: Yielding to it, it would leave its flanks open, so that logistics couldn't reinforce it. At that point the blitz would completely collapse on itself because it always went too far, was too successful, and ended up surrounded and cut off once the allies became wise to the trick.

This is that: The "racists!" card is the blitz. Everything fails before it. Everyone retreats to "well actually im not a racist!" out of fear of ostracism. But the logistics of it is "anti-semites!".

And if you yield to the label, if you point out the why, they never have a chance. The rhetorical trick of demonization fails on its face. Because the truth is this: They always say 'hate'. They never say 'anger'. Because the minute you reveal that its not about hate, but anger, the next question is the LAST question they want anyone to ask: WHY are these people angry at jewish people? At blacks and illegal aliens?

The state can't answer 'why' because it raises even more questions, and ultimately it reveals all their labels are bullshit anti-white genocidal racism by a arrogant holier-than-thou jewish-supremacist media establishment in the u.s.

And the old 'positive if you push through it hard enough' is this: No more infiltrators on our side. None. No more "well this subgroup of people are actually okay" to divide us on. The state will have inadvertently, with a little bit of effort from us, done the most difficult part for us. And if isolating and demonizing us was the plan all along, then speeding up the process only hurts their ability to time their plans and narratives long term--hurts their ability to control the outcome.

On the opposite side of fear and doubt, is certainty.

It's simple in hindsight. We can ride the middle and gain zero traction, with a no-platformed message about how we're "all the same", again, message supressed, or worse, have some state sponsored false flag to set us back to square one when we do gain any traction on the middleground of 'unity' 'us against the state/media/banks/etc'. OR, we can push hard in the opposite direction through hatred. Their attempts to divide us are like snow on a mountain. They count on time to evaporate interest like they count on the sun to melt snow. But if we pile on enough hate, well that little bit of snow, combine with all the hate they put out there, turns into an unstoppable boulder picking up momentum that they didn't anticipate or account for. It actually allows us to solidify around a single issue, THE ONE ISSUE that they *absolutely* DONT want us unified on: preventing the replacement of europeans, and our general survival as a people. The strength of the blitz in world war 2, as a tactic, was that it was sudden and fierce. It seemed unstoppable, like it would *always* work and the allies were powerless against it. It was only defeated when the achilles heel of the blitzkreig was found: Yielding to it, it would leave its flanks open, so that logistics couldn't reinforce it. At that point the blitz would completely collapse on itself because it always went too far, was too successful, and ended up surrounded and cut off once the allies became wise to the trick. This is that: The "racists!" card is the blitz. Everything fails before it. Everyone retreats to "well actually im not a racist!" out of fear of ostracism. But the logistics of it is "anti-semites!". And if you yield to the label, if you point out the *why*, they never have a chance. The rhetorical trick of demonization fails on its face. Because the truth is this: They always say 'hate'. They never say 'anger'. Because the minute you reveal that its not about hate, but anger, the next question is the LAST question they want anyone to ask: WHY are these people angry at jewish people? At blacks and illegal aliens? The state can't answer 'why' because it raises even more questions, and ultimately it reveals all their labels are bullshit anti-white genocidal racism by a arrogant holier-than-thou jewish-supremacist media establishment in the u.s. And the old 'positive if you push through it hard enough' is this: No more infiltrators on our side. None. No more "well this subgroup of people are actually okay" to divide us on. The state will have inadvertently, with a little bit of effort from us, done the most difficult part for us. And if isolating and demonizing us was the plan all along, then speeding up the process only hurts their ability to time their plans and narratives long term--hurts their ability to control the outcome. On the opposite side of fear and doubt, is certainty.

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

I think you're missing the point of all that white bashing they OBVIOUSLY push HARD on us

It's precisely to turn you hateful

Patton was racist, but he wasn't hateful

Hate is an emotion, emotions tend to blur the mind, they get in the way of reason

Now if you want to walk down that path, don't act surprised if it makes you do stupid stuffs. And, maybe, at some point you'll lose control and it's going to blow at your own face

Ask yourself why you need hatred to feel secure/safe/strong, for lack of better alternative

[–] 0 pt

It's precisely to turn you hateful

Hate is a normal human emotion. If you hate, hate well and for the right reasons.

Now if you want to walk down that path, don't act surprised if it makes you do stupid stuffs. And, maybe, at some point you'll lose control and it's going to blow at your own face

I fundamentally disagree with characterizing political opponents speech or points of view as dangerous or the vile semi-slander of the implications of it.

Ask yourself why you need hatred to feel secure/safe/strong,

Ask yourself why you jews need political censorship and demonization of christians and whites to feel secure/safe/strong, for lack of a better alternative.

[–] 1 pt

It's still an emotion, a strong one that makes your hands shake... I don't need that, I like my hands steady, and my mind clear

[–] 0 pt

It's still an emotion, a strong one that makes your hands shake...

Well maybe it makes your hands shake. I wouldn't know.