National Capitalism, as I see it | Poal: Say what you want.

1.0K

• (edited )

This is why I am a National Capitalist, which is basically to Night-Watchman State Minarchism what National Socialism was to Socialism. Just take the difference between National Socialism and Socialism, and apply it to the minimalist/essentialist state, and you got an idea of what I am talking about.

National Capitalism is White Nationalist, closing off immigration, foreign trade, (((international banking))), etc. but it makes a distinction between the interactions of our people with those in other countries that occur across borders, and interactions of our people among themselves that occur within the borders of it's own country.

Domestically, it favors a state that only concerns itself with enforcing the laws, defending the nation, and collecting taxes to provide those services. The laws themselves are also minimalist, based on the idea that everyone owns their person (consisting of their bodies and personal space around their bodies), and their property, and that all interactions with a citizen's person or property are only legal through the medium of the (informed and meaningful) consent of their owners to the interaction. There can be other laws, but the above is the framework for most of the laws that would exist under this system.

Keep in mind that these laws only apply to our own citizens and to any visitors our country has, not to anyone who is a citizen of another country and is outside our country, it is not our prerogative to apply our laws to the people of other legal systems, nor should we care about performing actions upon those other peoples that would be illegal to perform unto our own people, once again, I should make it clear that National Capitalism there is a distinction between the domestic/intranational and foreign/international.

There are variations, such as what additional laws should exist (a ban on intellectual property and laws regulating banking and corporations are popular) who the laws apply to within the country (if they apply to everyone, the people who support this do so with the hope that self-segregation within that country could occur, if the laws only apply to a specific group, such as the popular measure of only giving citizenship and rights to "living white male gentile humans", then the hope is that the rest of the country's population lives at the mercy of that "master caste" and will be moulded to their whims, or they will be exterminated, like the wolf ancestors of dogs were), or the specifics of the laws that were described (what should the age of consent be to make consent "meaningful and informed"? what should the taxes be set to? what other systems, laws, or policies are "essential", etc.).

One very popular idea is the idea of taking the ability to make changes to the laws away from political representatives, the idea being that when people are given the power to dictate policy, it inevitably leads to corruption ad decline, the idea is instead to make one political configuration that can be open enough to allow the people to find ways to adapt to and overcome any situation that they find themselves facing, therefore, the only job elected officials have, is to enforce the very basic framework of laws that exist.

The other popular idea of National Capitalism is the idea of applying the Scientific Methodology and Critical Thinking to politics, rather than going off of some ideological dogma, the idea is to simply set a goal and find what combination of policies best meet that goal, in the case of National Capitalism, the goal is finding what works best for Living White Male Gentile Humans, and that's it (it's hard to do because people are used to thinking in terms of "teams", and care more about which "side" a policy "belongs to" rather than what effect the policy actually has).

There is a lot of pushback to National Capitalism because it represents a brand new mode of thinking, it's gotten hate on /pol/ from diehard NatSocs, and its been subjected to undermining attempts to "soften" it into adopting the poison of "civic nationalism" (aka "coonservacuck-variant globalism").

As a new ideology, a lot of the framework is being set out by the people online, the philosophy is just being developed and there isn't much in the way of writing or resources other than the head-canon of multiple anons being posted to sites such as these. Jews are scared shitless of us, especially since we are very much unlike a lot of the White Nationalists they have met with before.

A lot of us came out of the 2008 4chan scene, we are populists in terms of race, sex, culture, and economics. We are a union of the various other online dissident movements that caused chaos back in the day, all of whom were spurned by their own movements once they betrayed their original ideals for which they once stood.

From out of 4chan and /b/, we are Free Speech Extremists, advocating for Absolute Freedom of Expression, Media, and Information.

From out of New Atheism, we are primarily Atheist, rejecting not only religion, but all other forms of faith, and very heavy into the Scientific Method and Critical Thinking as the only viable epistemology.

From out of Ron Paul loving Tea Partiers, we value the politics of Freedom and Transactional Ethics-of-Law, we also recognize that the Free Market is the best system for assessing and addressing the needs/wants of the people..

From out of MRA and MGTOW, we are Male Supremacists and Anti-LGBT.

From out of StormFront and /pol/itically Incorrect, we are White Supremacists and Anti-Semitic.

From out of the Alt-right and MIGA crowd, we are Nationalists and Populists.

We are the culmination of the internet's various disparate dissidents who came together due to how our own homes and their leaders had betrayed us, and found the missing pieces among the other outcasts, this was our alliance, of alienated people obsessed with one aspect of society, and it wasn't long before we put our fragmented ideas together into one ideology, (((they))) feared us a lot when we were apart, but together, we are their ultimate enemy.

I am for negative eugenics, the domestic laws and government services should be kept to the minimum, so that degenerates burn themselves by their own fire, and the rest of us could distance ourselves from them as they die out. Positive eugenics, like what the National Socialists had, I can respect, but I do not see it turning out well, I prefer things to be emergent, grassroots, decentralized, practical, I'm a traditionalist who sees the origin of tradition as being in their utility. This is why I am a National Capitalist, which is basically to Night-Watchman State Minarchism what National Socialism was to Socialism. Just take the difference between National Socialism and Socialism, and apply it to the minimalist/essentialist state, and you got an idea of what I am talking about. National Capitalism is White Nationalist, closing off immigration, foreign trade, (((international banking))), etc. but it makes a distinction between the interactions of our people with those in other countries that occur across borders, and interactions of our people among themselves that occur within the borders of it's own country. Domestically, it favors a state that only concerns itself with enforcing the laws, defending the nation, and collecting taxes to provide those services. The laws themselves are also minimalist, based on the idea that everyone owns their person (consisting of their bodies and personal space around their bodies), and their property, and that all interactions with a citizen's person or property are only legal through the medium of the (informed and meaningful) consent of their owners to the interaction. There can be other laws, but the above is the framework for most of the laws that would exist under this system. Keep in mind that these laws only apply to our own citizens and to any visitors our country has, not to anyone who is a citizen of another country and is outside our country, it is not our prerogative to apply our laws to the people of other legal systems, nor should we care about performing actions upon those other peoples that would be illegal to perform unto our own people, once again, I should make it clear that National Capitalism there is a distinction between the domestic/intranational and foreign/international. There are variations, such as what additional laws should exist (a ban on intellectual property and laws regulating banking and corporations are popular) who the laws apply to within the country (if they apply to everyone, the people who support this do so with the hope that self-segregation within that country could occur, if the laws only apply to a specific group, such as the popular measure of only giving citizenship and rights to "living white male gentile humans", then the hope is that the rest of the country's population lives at the mercy of that "master caste" and will be moulded to their whims, or they will be exterminated, like the wolf ancestors of dogs were), or the specifics of the laws that were described (what should the age of consent be to make consent "meaningful and informed"? what should the taxes be set to? what other systems, laws, or policies are "essential", etc.). One very popular idea is the idea of taking the ability to make changes to the laws away from political representatives, the idea being that when people are given the power to dictate policy, it inevitably leads to corruption ad decline, the idea is instead to make one political configuration that can be open enough to allow the people to find ways to adapt to and overcome any situation that they find themselves facing, therefore, the only job elected officials have, is to enforce the very basic framework of laws that exist. The other popular idea of National Capitalism is the idea of applying the Scientific Methodology and Critical Thinking to politics, rather than going off of some ideological dogma, the idea is to simply set a goal and find what combination of policies best meet that goal, in the case of National Capitalism, the goal is finding what works best for Living White Male Gentile Humans, and that's it (it's hard to do because people are used to thinking in terms of "teams", and care more about which "side" a policy "belongs to" rather than what effect the policy actually has). There is a lot of pushback to National Capitalism because it represents a brand new mode of thinking, it's gotten hate on /pol/ from diehard NatSocs, and its been subjected to undermining attempts to "soften" it into adopting the poison of "civic nationalism" (aka "coonservacuck-variant globalism"). As a new ideology, a lot of the framework is being set out by the people online, the philosophy is just being developed and there isn't much in the way of writing or resources other than the head-canon of multiple anons being posted to sites such as these. Jews are scared shitless of us, especially since we are very much unlike a lot of the White Nationalists they have met with before. A lot of us came out of the 2008 4chan scene, we are populists in terms of race, sex, culture, and economics. We are a union of the various other online dissident movements that caused chaos back in the day, all of whom were spurned by their own movements once they betrayed their original ideals for which they once stood. >From out of 4chan and /b/, we are Free Speech Extremists, advocating for Absolute Freedom of Expression, Media, and Information. > From out of New Atheism, we are primarily Atheist, rejecting not only religion, but all other forms of faith, and very heavy into the Scientific Method and Critical Thinking as the only viable epistemology. > From out of Ron Paul loving Tea Partiers, we value the politics of Freedom and Transactional Ethics-of-Law, we also recognize that the Free Market is the best system for assessing and addressing the needs/wants of the people.. > From out of MRA and MGTOW, we are Male Supremacists and Anti-LGBT. > From out of StormFront and /pol/itically Incorrect, we are White Supremacists and Anti-Semitic. > From out of the Alt-right and MIGA crowd, we are Nationalists and Populists. We are the culmination of the internet's various disparate dissidents who came together due to how our own homes and their leaders had betrayed us, and found the missing pieces among the other outcasts, this was our alliance, of alienated people obsessed with one aspect of society, and it wasn't long before we put our fragmented ideas together into one ideology, (((they))) feared us a lot when we were apart, but together, we are their ultimate enemy.

(post is archived)

You can claim this sub in /s/subrequest