Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

282

Imagine if a society was dominated by literal retards and they were making decisions that affect you, as a group rejected your views as wrong because they were not the consensus, and punished you during a time where you had no autonomy to do anything about it.

Retards do not like being contradicted, they find it to be an assault on them. Since their views are based on heuristics, they will not even understand logical arguments. That might not be a problem after you become a adult, but as a high IQ child among retards they'll instil a kind of fear of others that turns you into a hermit.

If eugenics was implemented, or high IQ people simply were given their own state or city, that wouldn't be an issue and the currenly high IQ people wouldn't develop into hermits and losers.

Imagine if a society was dominated by literal retards and they were making decisions that affect you, as a group rejected your views as wrong because they were not the consensus, and punished you during a time where you had no autonomy to do anything about it. Retards do not like being contradicted, they find it to be an assault on them. Since their views are based on heuristics, they will not even understand logical arguments. That might not be a problem after you become a adult, but as a high IQ child among retards they'll instil a kind of fear of others that turns you into a hermit. If eugenics was implemented, or high IQ people simply were given their own state or city, that wouldn't be an issue and the currenly high IQ people wouldn't develop into hermits and losers.

(post is archived)

[–] • 5 pts

There is an inverse relationship between friend count and IQ. The higher the IQ the less friends you have. This is not driven by antisocial behaviors. It's generally driven by incompatibility with others. Most can't appreciate the high IQ perspective, lack the knowledge to discuss, understand, or entertain, have few hobbies in common, and hold disdain for intellectual pursuits in general.

The result is a person with whom few can relate. This in turn tends to place people at odds with high IQs. Then enter Dunning-Kruger whereby the low IQs assume and see themselves as equal or frequently superior. The result is conflict at even the most trivial of disagreements.

[–] • 1 pt

Ah dunno wat Dunning-Kruger means, but dat don't matter, cause nobody else knows either.

[–] • 3 pts

The pedophiles tell everyone who to hate and who to love.

And they see us high IQ people as a threat. That's why they isolate us. If the normies ever listened to us the pedos would all hang.

[–] • 0 pt

Enter the conspiracy theory conspiracy and why it exists.

[–] • 2 pts

I'm not going to claim to be above the curve but I literally cannot imagine someone with 140+ IQ surviving Common Core schooling these days

[–] • 1 pt

I know everyone on voat had an IQ of at least 185 to hear them say it. Don't hear that as much here. I don't think what you're saying is true (but I'm not a high IQ guy, only a bit north of average). I've met some very intelligent people who were well adjusted and social, and average people who were social tards. I don't think that being a social retard has as much to do with IQ as it does to not being a very interesting or fun person.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt (edited )

average i.q. is 100. it seems the average i.q. in america is <100. that has happeded mostly this century. and it's intentional.

the n.w.o. wants uneducated slaves.

p.s. after the bolsheviks took over russia & eastern europe, anyone who had a college degree was viewed as a threat. bolsheviks murdered millions of educated people.