The same with executive actions to "protect" any right.
When any infringing law on the 2A or any other right, is sufficient cause to go to war, and always has been. Likewise the use of these laws during interference, or arrest of people exercising their rights.
They pass a law or action to "protect" a right. And we go along with it. And whats that say?
It says "well laws can giveth, so laws can taketh away". And come next 'election', they pass laws to remove those rights.
Same with saying "see the supreme court agrees with us! So their word is the final word and the law of the land!"
Until the supreme court rules against you.
We should assert we have rights regardless of what the law says, whether it "protects" those rights or not and not fall for this horseshit.
Disclaimer: not an incitement or suggestion toward violence/lawlessness.
The same with executive actions to "protect" any right.
When any infringing law on the 2A or any other right, is sufficient cause to go to war, and always has been. Likewise the use of these laws during interference, or arrest of people exercising their rights.
They pass a law or action to "protect" a right. And we go along with it. And whats that say?
It says "well laws can giveth, so laws can taketh away". And come next 'election', they pass laws to remove those rights.
Same with saying "see the supreme court agrees with us! So their word is the final word and the law of the land!"
Until the supreme court rules against you.
We should assert we have rights *regardless* of what the law says, whether it "protects" those rights or not and not fall for this horseshit.
Disclaimer: not an incitement or suggestion toward violence/lawlessness.
(post is archived)