(analysis) "support trannyism to cause LGBT infighting! -> Trannyism everywhere", removing whites from media, and martial law.

1.3K

•

Remember how the "support trannyism to split LGBT and cause infighting!" narrative developed a few years ago?

Whats up next: porn, now with more blacks, trannies, and other 'minorities'. Far more.

All that was, and whats to follow is the enemy giving us ideas based on what they're already planning, and then claim it was our doing all along.

It'll also ramp up in advertising like you wouldn't believe. Oh you thought it was bad now?

Try eighty to ninety percent blacks/minorities/trannies in commercials instead. A near total ban on straights and whites in advertising.

This will be just the start.

They need us to vanish from the public eye, before they can ramp up the censorship any further. Once thats accomplished over the next year, they move to have the same done for actual television shows and movies. The profits don't matter because hollywood is a money laundering machine, not an entertainment industry. It's why they can 'lose money' on everything they make and still remain in business year over year.

Once television and movies are 50-80% 'minority' (and not just advertising), and censorship is in FULL swing, tied to credit and internet history in less than two years (good luck being allowed to even use some businesses in ordinary society with a social credit score thats too low for visiting bitchute or gab!), then at the 2 year mark, the ramp up in rounding up dissidents will begin in earnest.

A few hundred a week. Maybe you'll hear about it as only rumors, or maybe they'll blast it out in full force to demoralize people. When the pushback happens it'll happen in earnest, but be largely disorganized at first, heavily infiltrated by federal agencies and "patriot navy seals and long time military vets" who work for the alphabet agencies, and the rallies and orgs associated with them will be demonized, maligned, mis-portrayed as violent, any violence that does happen will be blown massively out of proportion (and compared to january sixth, which was the test run for the system), and likely done by undercovers and third parties paid for by NGOs and agencies themselves.

After that, going from the 2 to 3 year mark, will be a year where, in response to the 'pushback', the government will ramp up dissident round-ups to a level they wont be able to deny. They might blame it on a 'combination or confluence of factors radicalizing people', such as "anti-vaxx, anti-immigrant sentiments, dangerous conspiracy theories about marxism and gun confiscation, political grievances about a waning white middle class and diminishing white influence in politics in a rapidly changing america", etc. Point is it'll be by the hundreds, maybe per week or every other week, or month.

But by the time its ramped up in full, it'll be by the thousands, and rather than taking people out of their homes, they'll simply "lockdown" whole towns or counties, because of "risks of radicalism and political instability". Troops on the street in counties labelled dissident, where there are too many people to round up without causing civil conflict on a larger scale. Troops enforcing liberalism, masks, vaccination, gun 'checks' (red flag laws, restricted laws about magazine size, having too much ammo, making the 'wrong' comments online), searching for "radicalized/red flagged" individuals. There will be some comparison to "peace keeping", and some troops will openly question if the operations are legal on u.s soil, but ultimately it will continue and ramp up in intensity and scope.

And this will not culminate in anything but it being normalized. It won't lead to a 'bigger bang' or anything. It'll become every day life. Just like it is in some middle eastern countries.

And part of this will be because of the purges, and repressive measures being put in place in the military now, to assure the ideological and cultural attitude of the military is as pro-marxism and pro-left as possible in the next 3 years.

I put this in the 60-70% certainty category for this exact outcome and timeline, and the 70-80% category for this general outcome and timeline.

Remember how the "support trannyism to split LGBT and cause infighting!" narrative developed a few years ago? Whats up next: porn, now with more blacks, trannies, and other 'minorities'. Far more. All that was, and whats to follow is the enemy giving us ideas based on what they're already planning, and then claim it was our doing all along. It'll also ramp up in advertising like you wouldn't believe. Oh you thought it was bad now? Try *eighty to ninety percent* blacks/minorities/trannies in commercials instead. A near total ban on straights and whites in advertising. This will be just the *start*. They need us to vanish from the public eye, before they can ramp up the censorship any further. Once thats accomplished over the next year, they move to have the same done for actual television shows and movies. The profits don't matter because hollywood is a money laundering machine, not an entertainment industry. It's why they can 'lose money' on everything they make and still remain in business year over year. Once television and movies are 50-80% 'minority' (and not just advertising), and censorship is in FULL swing, tied to credit and internet history in less than two years (good luck being allowed to even use some businesses in ordinary society with a social credit score thats too low for visiting bitchute or gab!), then at the 2 year mark, the *ramp up* in rounding up dissidents will begin in earnest. A few hundred a week. Maybe you'll hear about it as only rumors, or maybe they'll blast it out in full force to demoralize people. When the pushback happens it'll happen in earnest, but be largely disorganized at first, heavily infiltrated by federal agencies and "patriot navy seals and long time military vets" who work for the alphabet agencies, and the rallies and orgs associated with them will be demonized, maligned, mis-portrayed as violent, any violence that does happen will be blown *massively* out of proportion (and compared to january sixth, which was the test run for the system), and likely done by undercovers and third parties paid for by NGOs and agencies themselves. After that, going *from* the 2 to 3 year mark, will be a year where, in response to the 'pushback', the government will ramp up dissident round-ups to a level they wont be able to deny. They might blame it on a 'combination or confluence of factors radicalizing people', such as "anti-vaxx, anti-immigrant sentiments, dangerous conspiracy theories about marxism and gun confiscation, political grievances about a waning white middle class and diminishing white influence in politics in a rapidly changing america", etc. Point is it'll be by the hundreds, maybe *per week* or every other week, or month. But by the time its ramped up in full, it'll be by the thousands, and rather than taking people out of their homes, they'll simply "lockdown" whole towns or counties, because of "risks of radicalism and political instability". Troops on the street in counties labelled dissident, where there are too many people to round up without causing civil conflict on a larger scale. Troops enforcing liberalism, masks, vaccination, gun 'checks' (red flag laws, restricted laws about magazine size, having too much ammo, making the 'wrong' comments online), searching for "radicalized/red flagged" individuals. There will be some comparison to "peace keeping", and some troops will openly question if the operations are legal on u.s soil, but ultimately it will continue and ramp up in intensity and scope. And this will not culminate in anything but it being normalized. It won't lead to a 'bigger bang' or anything. It'll become every day life. Just like it is in some middle eastern countries. And part of this will be because of the purges, and repressive measures being put in place in the military now, to assure the ideological and cultural attitude of the military is as pro-marxism and pro-left as possible in the next 3 years. I put this in the 60-70% certainty category for this exact outcome and timeline, and the 70-80% category for this general outcome and timeline.

[–] • 1 pt

Sometimes it can be quite impactful to structure the book as a series of spotlights on different places, times and people and let the reader make the connections. Probably a lot less constricting than writing a continuous stream of narrative.

You know you really are smarter than you let on.

(post is archived)

You can claim this sub in /s/subrequest