Hitler is a weapon of mass disruption or "my favorite billy club." Part of the reason we are losing the argument on the long term, why ideologically, the real "alternative right" continues to lose ground, lose the war, while winning battles, is because our opponents brainwashed footsoldiers are zealots, and none of the "sides" really talk to one another in any meaningful numbers any more. That is by intention of those who would continue to see us obliterated, who would continue to see the *west* erased. So here we have the four D's: Deny, Differentiate, Demonize, and Denote. This is my new favorite tactic, and in a moment, I will illustrate why it should be yours too. And if you use this tactic, there is hope, that we can and *will* win, for real. No more fake leaders. No more propaganda destroying america. Against this the state has nothing to respond with. And now for an object lesson in how the internationalists propaganda has provided the means to destroy them. What is an "achilles heel" for $500 alex? A fictional conversation between a commie and john, the american. commie: you're a rightwinger john: I'm not a rightwinger, I'm a conservative. (differentiate) commie: They're the same thing john: No they're not. I stand for traditional values, protection of my nation, and family (differentiate) commie: Thats the same thing. john: No rightwingers are nazis. (demonize). They believe in labelling people. Socialism for one group of people, but not another. Spreading division based on race. commie: Thats basically conservatives. john: No you mean rightwing nazi. (demonize). I hate nazis. Why are you insistent on dividing people and spreading division based on race? (denote, or attribute nazi qualities to them) commie: I'm not! This works because you have [1] agreed nazis are bad, neutralizing their attempt to get others to label you by forcing you to defend what the public percieves as an indefensible position [2] Denies their charge out right. [3] differentiates the emotional trigger label of "rightwing" from conservative. [4] Brings the differentiation back down to earth and grounds it in reality, instead of simple unthinking labels. It does this by putting constraints on the label "divides base on race. Labels people." These are all things the left engages in, and projects onto the right. Therefore by setting these out, they now will have a harder time using these tactics without onlookers seeing them for what they are. They will likely try to argue definitions at this point, or talk about "historical differences!" between "oppressed peoples" and "whites!" and at this point you stick to your guns here. John might say "so dividing people by race and labelling them. Got it. So you're a nazi" (demonization). You could, at this point change that word, "nazi" for "demon" or any other type of liturgical sleight-of-hand, without really changing the meaning in the other persons mind. It's a boogieman label. Its them shouting "witch!" And the way you scare them into silence is by labeling *them* a witch in a way that, if they continue in their behavior, it would obviously make them appear "witch-like" or in this case "nazi like". Because appearances, virtue-signalling, and going with the crowd, is what these people do. They're deathly afraid of being an "outsider" and so take their impotent rage out on others. [5] "Why are you insistent on dividing people and spreading division based on race?" This denotes to *them* the behavior of the group label *you* just defined the constraints for. If they argue at this point "thats not what a nazi is! Rightwingers are nazis!" you now have free reign to respond with "an you would know, wouldn't you?", as smugly as possible. The implication is obviously that they're a nazi. Any attempt to extract themselves from this position can now be cast as them "defending the nazis." Just do it over and over. They end up having to give up. There only alternative is not to engage at all in public, in which case, they lose. If they overreact, they look neurotic (which they are). If they shout over the person, they look unreasonable, and like a bunch of stupid fascists. When you've reached this stage, they are now on their back foot. You can now argue for *anything*, really. Anything at all. The 4D (4D chess memes need not apply) tactic works because it disrupts a core element of the psychology of the demoralized, *the defensive* strategies they use. You change from defending yourself, to redirecting *their* attacks onto *them*. The normal loop of increasing hysterics as a form of attack against someone, is then shortcircuited. They're forced to choose between increasing hysterics or self-defending. And because *demoralization* relies on *psychologically prepping* someone, like pavlovs dog, to *respond* automatically, they have no "internal policy" for choosing. Thats the nature of propaganda and brainwashing, the whole *point* of it: removing someones ability to make decisions. You want them to *think* in a certain pattern. You select for the correct *point* in their process, to insert your own payload, and it shuts down the loop. Enough people do this, we *retrain* the public to simply shutdown on their own. Like a broken bootloader. And then the work becomes conditioning those in public who can be reached, to become *button pressers* against the left. Call it "reverse-demoralization" or "counter-programming". We make the job easy for *them*, and by clearing the air, we enable them to *clear the ground*. This has a double effect: Because its known that giving people a *process*, *any process* that they believe works, helps to distract the parts of the brain responsible for fear. And so, anyone who follows this strategy we have effectively *recruited* whether they realize or not. Sort of like how those conservatives who have been demoralized become blackpilled, and *spread* their demoralization. This is not unlike the finkelthink strategy of, instead of appealing to *your* party, simply *discouraging* the other, but where thats an *offensive* technique, this is essentially a *defensive* method. And with each person converted, it establishes a *beachhead*. Because the beauty in this strategy is, once someone has been counter-programmed to *shutdown* when confronted, the media can no longer use the most **essential* element to effective propaganda: strawmanning. They will have lost the optics war *from the beginning*, *for good*. They will no longer be able to set up emotional labelling psychological prep-work in the public because anyone thats been counter-programmed will immediately shut down upon seeing a strawman or counter-argument on tv. The brainwashed will become permanently counter demoralized. And because of the lag time in cronyist bureaucracies suffering the grip of the iron law of oligarchy, those who have become unreachable will become psychological *dead weight* to the financial class and their political calculations. The lag time will mean they'll *still* be appealing to these people, even as these people have become useless to them and unmoveable--even as the propaganda becomes increasingly *ineffective*. Use this technique, and watch the tide turn at last. I have seen it, I have known it. It works. And it is so effective, it won't be threats, or pornography, or "terrorism" that gets poal and other sites shut down. It will be this post, and people sharing this post. Of all the posts I've wrote, this is probably the one that will get me vanished. Its that effective. Its that dangerous. And it was worth it.