Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.1K

Another user wrote something worth reading, and I wanted you to read it too.

If we cannot convince the people to give us a chance to prove our selves, we are not worthy of leadership.

I both applaud his dedication, and want to explain something important:

the reason economic factors are being pursued is because normalcy bias means companies threatening to fire people will take precedence over reasoned argument, almost every time.

The state figured out a clever way to bypass their weakening grip on information: Just take away peoples ability to live if they don't comply. And use fanatics in HR and bureaucracy to do it.

Thats why it'll be war I think. A lot of people are going to conclude that the people managing this on the ground are cowards, and out of anger, I can see a lot of people choosing threats and force, be it fisticuffs or mobs like are happening in france. Because, having no way to dissuade fanatics, and no means to voice their grievances, when you back people into a corner, they either leave (quit their job), or they fight/riot.

That is how I see it going down and I'm fairly confident at this point of that assessment.

And if I see the situation this way, then the ones running the show must too. And if they do, then we can only conclude that is the outcome they wanted to begin with.

There isn't anything we can really do to prevent it. This is only to tell you what I think will unfold in the u.s. after a while.

The u.s. is finally preparing for full martial law and a simultenous "loss" of the ability to control the extremists in the DNC.

Ironically an old probable kkk member is taking down the federal government, leaving israel completely exposed to her neighbors.

Which means we'll probably be at war with iran soon.

Which means there will probably be an attack by the federal government or israel and GCHQ on the u.s., larger than 9/11.

I doubt September, but they could surprise us all. Almost absolutely certain it will be in october, but soon we'll begin to see the narrative priming the public for whatever is to happen, 2-3 weeks before it does. Maybe sooner.

That is all.

Another user wrote something worth reading, and I wanted you to read it too. > If we cannot convince the people to give us a chance to prove our selves, we are not worthy of leadership. I both applaud his dedication, and want to explain something important: the reason economic factors are being pursued is because normalcy bias means companies threatening to fire people will take precedence over reasoned argument, almost every time. The state figured out a clever way to bypass their weakening grip on information: Just take away peoples ability to live if they don't comply. And use fanatics in HR and bureaucracy to do it. Thats why it'll be war I think. A lot of people are going to conclude that the people managing this on the ground are cowards, and out of anger, I can see a lot of people choosing threats and force, be it fisticuffs or mobs like are happening in france. Because, having no way to dissuade fanatics, and no means to voice their grievances, when you back people into a corner, they either leave (quit their job), or they fight/riot. That is how I see it going down and I'm fairly confident at this point of that assessment. And if I see the situation this way, then the ones running the show must too. And if they do, then we can only conclude that is the outcome they wanted to begin with. There isn't anything we can really do to prevent it. This is only to tell you what I think will unfold in the u.s. after a while. The u.s. is finally preparing for full martial law and a simultenous "loss" of the ability to control the extremists in the DNC. Ironically an old probable kkk member is taking down the federal government, leaving israel completely exposed to her neighbors. Which means we'll probably be at war with iran soon. Which means there will probably be an attack by the federal government or israel and GCHQ on the u.s., larger than 9/11. I doubt September, but they could surprise us all. Almost absolutely certain it will be in october, but soon we'll begin to see the narrative priming the public for whatever is to happen, 2-3 weeks before it does. Maybe sooner. That is all.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (18).
[–] • 2 pts (edited )

The whole aim is to get retards to bicker while particular things are distracted from.

Look at the news about October. Look at the fallout of the Epstein story. Look at the Awans, Dancing Israelis, Feinstein's driver. Look at Seth Rich and Assange.

I could make a giant list, but the gist is the plandemic is largely about stopping people from asking, "what was with that nuke in Hawaii?" or "Wait, Epstein/Maxwell coerced teens in to sleeping with Prince Andrew?" or "You mean Rachel Chandler peddled teenage girls (maybe boys too, for all I know) through the Standard Hotel?" or "Hey, what's with the unaccounted for budget and all of that drilling and those Earthquakes that don't record typically on seismometers?" or "So why can't we go to Antarctica?" or "Are there actually aliens or not?" or "Is Evolution a viable theory?" or any other naughty question.

It's just a big circle and you're staring at one small section. Guess what, in two weeks, you'll be staring at another. This time, it might be painted a different color and have a ribbon on it. Yay. Now go back to work, keep paying your taxes, not fucking your wife, ignoring your gay son and eating the bugs.

[–] • 0 pt

The whole aim is to get retards to bicker while particular things are distracted from.

If the state wants something not talked about they'll just ignore and censor completely. This is completely within their power to do.

What bigger perspective would you have me consider?

[–] • 1 pt

No, censoring things isn't always that simple. There's a lot of expenditure of resources that goes in to "censoring" things through legal channels or even compelling goons at some corporation to do it on your behalf. Besides, there's always the biting possibility of the Streisand Effect.

But, yeah, this is one of the methods of ignoring things. If you think about it, ignoring something means talking about something else.

What would I have you consider? Well, for starters, there isn't a simple avenue for war. Before any large scale conflict would break out, there would be serious defection, for starters. If a rogue vigilant or militia group pops up, they'll be infiltrated or at least negotiated with outside of regular channels. If a riot breaks out, the national guard rolls in a throws up a few toys the public wouldn't enjoy and would quickly disperse. Frankly, what we'd seen over the past few years was controlled, people were bribed, etc.

All in all, things have to get bad enough for certain obligations to be met. I'm not going to promise all of the work will be done for us, but there is a certain extent things are allowed to go without generous intervention because that's how we prevent large scales of violence but also regain much more control. At the moment, certain people are holding on to power for dear life and they understand fully that if they let go, they and people like them will either have a very fucking long wait ahead of them or never get power again. That's why you're seeing so many deep fakes, it's why a demented man is "president", it's why Epstein got brushed under the rug and taken somewhere obscure. It's why there's so many leaks.

The proles are being given ample room to restore the balance as best they can in as calm a manner as possible. There is no "it's getting to bad not to use violence". That won't be allowed. Believe me when I say, despite it not seeming like it, that it could get much worse. The vaccine probably won't actually do much harm. It's just about compliance.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

I understand what you're trying to say here, and why you're explaining it.

The vaccine probably won't actually do much harm. It's just about compliance.

I figured as much, but "much harm" to the state, and "much harm" to the public are two very different things.

They should be giving saline. I don't care that it doesn't work. It'd be cheaper on the margins of the corporations make it anyway.

I know why, because again compliance to unreasonable demands means its real compliance. Otherwise its not a test.

But broadly speaking they are creating unintended consequences: there is a segment of the public that is forming hard opposition to any dictatorship.

I don't see it as sustainable.

The u.s. will turn into Afghanistan in a few years if they keep up this strategy.

I don't know how they expect to pay for the amount of troops it will require to subdue the u.s. permanently, with resistance increasing over every week and month it goes on, without going broke. Hell, we're already broke as a nation.

And thats set to get worse with our failure on the international stage sealing the fate of the dollar.

Maybe the military has some level of competence here, but I don't think the bureaucrats have any real long term vision of where they're going with this, except what you said: holding onto power at all costs.

Which means the u.s. governments gonna kill fucking boatloads more americans. A few million here, a few million there. Maybe more.

Thats the only way I see them doing it.

Tell me I'm wrong.