WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.4K

Another user wrote something worth reading, and I wanted you to read it too.

If we cannot convince the people to give us a chance to prove our selves, we are not worthy of leadership.

I both applaud his dedication, and want to explain something important:

the reason economic factors are being pursued is because normalcy bias means companies threatening to fire people will take precedence over reasoned argument, almost every time.

The state figured out a clever way to bypass their weakening grip on information: Just take away peoples ability to live if they don't comply. And use fanatics in HR and bureaucracy to do it.

Thats why it'll be war I think. A lot of people are going to conclude that the people managing this on the ground are cowards, and out of anger, I can see a lot of people choosing threats and force, be it fisticuffs or mobs like are happening in france. Because, having no way to dissuade fanatics, and no means to voice their grievances, when you back people into a corner, they either leave (quit their job), or they fight/riot.

That is how I see it going down and I'm fairly confident at this point of that assessment.

And if I see the situation this way, then the ones running the show must too. And if they do, then we can only conclude that is the outcome they wanted to begin with.

There isn't anything we can really do to prevent it. This is only to tell you what I think will unfold in the u.s. after a while.

The u.s. is finally preparing for full martial law and a simultenous "loss" of the ability to control the extremists in the DNC.

Ironically an old probable kkk member is taking down the federal government, leaving israel completely exposed to her neighbors.

Which means we'll probably be at war with iran soon.

Which means there will probably be an attack by the federal government or israel and GCHQ on the u.s., larger than 9/11.

I doubt September, but they could surprise us all. Almost absolutely certain it will be in october, but soon we'll begin to see the narrative priming the public for whatever is to happen, 2-3 weeks before it does. Maybe sooner.

That is all.

Another user wrote something worth reading, and I wanted you to read it too. > If we cannot convince the people to give us a chance to prove our selves, we are not worthy of leadership. I both applaud his dedication, and want to explain something important: the reason economic factors are being pursued is because normalcy bias means companies threatening to fire people will take precedence over reasoned argument, almost every time. The state figured out a clever way to bypass their weakening grip on information: Just take away peoples ability to live if they don't comply. And use fanatics in HR and bureaucracy to do it. Thats why it'll be war I think. A lot of people are going to conclude that the people managing this on the ground are cowards, and out of anger, I can see a lot of people choosing threats and force, be it fisticuffs or mobs like are happening in france. Because, having no way to dissuade fanatics, and no means to voice their grievances, when you back people into a corner, they either leave (quit their job), or they fight/riot. That is how I see it going down and I'm fairly confident at this point of that assessment. And if I see the situation this way, then the ones running the show must too. And if they do, then we can only conclude that is the outcome they wanted to begin with. There isn't anything we can really do to prevent it. This is only to tell you what I think will unfold in the u.s. after a while. The u.s. is finally preparing for full martial law and a simultenous "loss" of the ability to control the extremists in the DNC. Ironically an old probable kkk member is taking down the federal government, leaving israel completely exposed to her neighbors. Which means we'll probably be at war with iran soon. Which means there will probably be an attack by the federal government or israel and GCHQ on the u.s., larger than 9/11. I doubt September, but they could surprise us all. Almost absolutely certain it will be in october, but soon we'll begin to see the narrative priming the public for whatever is to happen, 2-3 weeks before it does. Maybe sooner. That is all.

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt (edited )

I can't agree with you.

The metaphor doesn't work. The teacher is actively causing the splintering.

Now, I'm not saying we all compromise all our morals, our freedoms or even our privileges. But

That is exactly what you are saying. At least have the conviction of your words.

A better metaphor is the teacher has a bunch of students, who were mostly getting on well enough. No one was particularly happy but things were not entirely and utterly terrible.

Then the teacher gave one half of the students knives and told them the other half are the devil.

The teacher then proceeded to give them matches and teach the children how to use them.

Come to your own conclusions.

I don't think I'll be compromising with evil, thanks but no thanks.

The metaphor is really just trivializing life and death decisions millions of americans are making right now, today, and in the coming weeks through October.

It was never about our pride. We weren't allowed to have any.

It was about the state smacking around the public at will whenever it felt like.

It's abuse and its nonsense. And thats all it is.

[–] 0 pt

The "teacher" are the benevolent forces who could overwhelm "evil" if they wished to enough. The "parents" are greater forces most aren't familiar with. The children are the ones prone to evil.

The difference is "teacher" doesn't want to intervene. The children are the only ones that can hurt each other. "Teacher" would be unfazed no matter what the children throw at him.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

The "teacher" are the benevolent forces who could overwhelm "evil" if they wished to enough.

No, what your metaphor is, is garbage.

And what you are doing is spreading some fucking clownworld dave-icke-style nonsense.

[–] 0 pt

Well then it sounds like you're going to be a bit disappointed.