To win, use the motorcade approach. Make the religious conflict of CRT about Economic freedom. Tie it to the cost of gasoline and assaults on motorists.

307

•

One of the most american thing you will ever encounter is the right to drive. I saw a discussion recently about how CRT was really just criminals rebranding their crime as anti-racism. That its really the upperclass using the lowerclass to rob and assault the middle class.

The people discussing it suggested making it about economics. Some disagreed. But I see this as a rich possibility. The war of independance was not kicked off simply by a tea tax, that was only the final deathblow to the legitimacy of regime of the time. Tea was seen as a core part of the british and colonial identity. It was what you drank when you had friends and neighbors over. What you discussed business over, what you drank while seeing relatives. It was what you drank at dinner when you gathered with your family around the table and talked about your day. It was as much a part of them as their rifles. Yes really.

Others suggested "producers vs. parasites" as a narrative, but I think theres a better alternative:

Gasoline.

Gasoline and vehicles.

Today both of these things are at their very center, a pillar of american identity--as much as tea was to the colonists before and after the 1770s.

We saw an uproar over just a few things:

Motorists being attacked
Soldiers killed in terror attacks (failed to motivate the public because we can always be redirected into discussions of whether or not to go back to war)
CRT in schools (which isn't where we'll win anyway, because the unions+the courts can always override us with the help of republican governors stabbing us in the back like they always do.)
Statues (motivated counter protest and militia activity)
Masks (but not jabs for some reason, motivated people to push back but ultimately failed to upset enough people)

Of all these things, what we CAN actively support is pushback against CRT, and motor-based protests.

Another user wrote that entryism could be limited with this route, and they are 100% right. Take the motorcade or "trump train" strategy and multiply it by 100.

Antifa and blm mostly don't drive, nor do college students.

They're forced into conspicuous assaults on motorists, which plays into our hands, and gives us the victim narrative again.

And it limits them from infiltrating us because cops and federal informants working for the u.s. spy state can't simply join your car pool like they join a protest. Vehicles also protect you from small arms fire, kettling by blue union police, knock-out style assaults, stabbings and bludgeoning. Vehicles let you move quickly away from a mob. They let you reorganize on a dime. They can work as shelter in a pinch when the hotel industry starts to decline us for ideological reasons.

They allow us to do night missions, such as sign drops, allow us to meet up anywhere, and scatter as needed. They allow us to do ride alongs and longer protest campaigns.

Gasoline and vehicles are key.

The tyranny is also a LOT more visible when the police inevitably crack down. It's not like the FBI breaking down your door with swat, killing your dog, and pointing guns at your family. The media can limit exposure of any film. Out in public, like at check points, or where police cut off a convoy, its dozens, maybe hundreds of eyeballs on them, eyes and cameras, so they can't limit any abuses of the public from getting out to alternative news and social media.

Vehicles, like tea, are an absolute psychological core symbol of the middle class, which, naturally, is why people with vehicles were the some of the VERY first victims of assault by blm/antifa/anarchists.

Thats ultimately where the conflict is at.

First step would actually be rollback of laws protecting drivers from mob assault. The conflict has to be amplified, not squelched.

From there we let them make the mistake of being emboldened.

Call it "the great american freedom crusade" or "freedom riders" or "motor militia". Hell if I know. Pickup truck patriots. Carpool conservatives. Pulls double duty because its easy to mock, which gives us free press and spreads the meme. And that works because unlike the state/left, the right doesn't care about mockery.

The only way the state can fight it is by becoming conspicuous: limiting gasoline or raising the prices, or using state police against us, which means it pits the police unions against the right and politically isolates them from the "muh thin blue line" DNC gatekeepers in the GOP.

And then from there we only have to find a way to agitate and amplify public dissatisfaction and direct it as we will.

For example It's illegal to encourage a bank run, but its not illegal to encourage a run on gas stations. Imagine the police in portland washington, or langely virginia unable to get gasoline, because the local motor militia bought tens of thousands of gallons and started a panic like the TP panic last year? Imagine if that happened while antifa/blm were out and about. Would instantly create the narrative that "how is the federal government supposed to replace local police and protect us, if it can't even protect its own headquarters/home counties?"

To win, use the motorcade approach. Make the religious conflict of CRT about Economic freedom. Tie it to the cost of gasoline and assaults on motorists. One of the most american thing you will ever encounter is the right to drive. I saw a discussion recently about how CRT was really just criminals rebranding their crime as anti-racism. That its really the upperclass using the lowerclass to rob and assault the middle class. The people discussing it suggested making it about economics. Some disagreed. But I see this as a rich possibility. The war of independance was not kicked off simply by a tea tax, that was only the final deathblow to the legitimacy of regime of the time. Tea was seen as a core part of the british and colonial *identity*. It was what you drank when you had friends and neighbors over. What you discussed business over, what you drank while seeing relatives. It was what you drank at dinner when you gathered with your family around the table and talked about your day. It was as much a part of them as their rifles. Yes really. Others suggested "producers vs. parasites" as a narrative, but I think theres a better alternative: Gasoline. Gasoline and vehicles. Today both of these things are at their *very center*, a *pillar* of american identity--as much as tea was to the colonists before and after the 1770s. We saw an uproar over just a few things: * Motorists being attacked * Soldiers killed in terror attacks (failed to motivate the public because we can always be redirected into discussions of whether or not to go *back* to war) * CRT in schools (which isn't where we'll win anyway, because the unions+the courts can always override us with the help of republican governors stabbing us in the back like they always do.) * Statues (motivated counter protest and militia activity) * Masks (but not jabs for some reason, motivated people to push back but ultimately failed to upset enough people) Of all these things, what we CAN actively support is pushback against CRT, and motor-based protests. Another user wrote that entryism could be limited with this route, and they are 100% right. Take the motorcade or "trump train" strategy and multiply it by 100. Antifa and blm mostly don't drive, nor do college students. They're forced into conspicuous assaults on motorists, which plays into our hands, and gives us the victim narrative again. And it limits them from infiltrating us because cops and federal informants working for the u.s. spy state can't simply join your car pool like they join a protest. Vehicles also protect you from small arms fire, kettling by blue union police, knock-out style assaults, stabbings and bludgeoning. Vehicles let you move quickly away from a mob. They let you reorganize on a dime. They can work as shelter in a pinch when the hotel industry starts to decline us for ideological reasons. They allow us to do night missions, such as sign drops, allow us to meet up anywhere, and scatter as needed. They allow us to do ride alongs and longer protest campaigns. Gasoline and vehicles are key. The tyranny is also a LOT more visible when the police inevitably crack down. It's not like the FBI breaking down your door with swat, killing your dog, and pointing guns at your family. The media can limit exposure of any film. Out in public, like at check points, or where police cut off a convoy, its dozens, maybe *hundreds* of eyeballs on them, eyes and cameras, so they can't limit any abuses of the public from getting out to alternative news and social media. Vehicles, like tea, are an *absolute* psychological *core* symbol of the middle class, which, naturally, is why people with vehicles were the some of the VERY *first* victims of assault by blm/antifa/anarchists. Thats ultimately where the conflict is at. First step would actually be *rollback* of laws protecting drivers from mob assault. The conflict has to be amplified, not squelched. From there we let them make the mistake of being emboldened. Call it "the great american freedom crusade" or "freedom riders" or "motor militia". Hell if I know. Pickup truck patriots. Carpool conservatives. Pulls double duty because its easy to mock, which gives us free press and spreads the meme. And that works because unlike the state/left, the right doesn't care about mockery. The only way the state can fight it is by becoming conspicuous: limiting gasoline or raising the prices, or using state police against us, which means it pits the police unions against the right and politically isolates them from the "muh thin blue line" DNC gatekeepers in the GOP. And then from there we only have to find a way to agitate and amplify public dissatisfaction and direct it as we will. For example It's illegal to encourage a bank run, but its *not* illegal to encourage a run on gas stations. Imagine the police in portland washington, or langely virginia unable to get gasoline, because the local motor militia bought tens of thousands of gallons and started a panic like the TP panic last year? Imagine if that happened while antifa/blm were out and about. Would instantly create the narrative that "how is the federal government supposed to replace local police and protect us, if it can't even protect its own headquarters/home counties?"

[–] • 1 pt

As feedback I'm not sure I see the overall strategy and endgame clearly here, but I appreciate the effort you put into this idea. Are you going to try to run with this? I'm certainly not going to argue against anyone's efforts to gain us an advantage.

[–] • 0 pt

(edited )

As feedback I'm not sure I see the overall strategy and endgame clearly here

The thinking goes that anything that loses them the high ground is a victory.

Anything that rallies our people, that creates a common enemy, or common grievance, is a winning direction.

The way I see it is, the explicit goal short/midterm isn't obvious, but this is a good starting place, where before we didn't know where to start.

We create the pretext, which makes us targets of the left (makes us targets for assault), which amplifies the victim and grievance narrative. You have to have legitimate grievances before you can justify any sort of broader movement.

The man on the street is dead. The man traveling freely is a living issue, its at the heart of everything. It extends even to metaphor: Look at the lockdowns. Look at prisons. No travel. Movement is restricted. But movement is freedom, travel is liberty. It elides well with the biker set without being explicitly about bikers, which means the state will have trouble classifying it as a gang without losing more legitimacy.

And we get to use madmax memes for free, seeing as half our side practically believes its the apocalypse and bolshevism is taking over anyway (and it may well be, who knows).

The image macros write themselves.

But it also means geographic organization is now plausible. And federal informants/infiltrators/entrapment officers are all easily identifiable by their rides.

It also means we are.

But hypothetically thats a good thing anyway, because now more than ever we need to visibily show our strength in numbers, because anonymity is just being used to cast us as terrorists rather than patriots. The three percenters went public and it actually did a lot to insulate them from the occupation's suppression tactics.

This is that, but non-militant.

The other thing is this makes sign-drops or protests/picketing easy: put em right on your vehicle. Fed-hired street thugs cant be used to rip down the signs because we can just move it faster than they can show up. The avoidance of violence, combine with high-impact visibility (using a motorcade) projects strength and level-headedness both of which are hugely appealing to the middle. The middle is the biggest necessary component of the public to influence if we want to force the hand of the occupation (spy agencies, banks) and its gatekeepers (DNC, their lackies the GOP, wallstreet, social media, news complex, etc) on policy matters.

If we combine it with support for veterans and a handpicked set of pastors we have a sufficiently powerful coalition to blockbust the false evangelical movement and cut off the state's terror-propaganda being used to cow the libertarian/moderate left into compliance.

> As feedback I'm not sure I see the overall strategy and endgame clearly here The thinking goes that anything that loses them the high ground is a victory. Anything that rallies our people, that creates a common enemy, or common grievance, is a winning direction. The way I see it is, the explicit goal short/midterm isn't obvious, but this is a good *starting* place, where before we didn't know where to start. We create the pretext, which makes us targets of the left (makes us targets for assault), which amplifies the victim and grievance narrative. You have to have legitimate grievances before you can justify any sort of broader movement. The man on the street is dead. The *man traveling freely* is a living issue, its at the heart of everything. It extends even to metaphor: Look at the lockdowns. Look at prisons. No travel. Movement is restricted. But movement is freedom, travel is liberty. It elides well with the biker set without being explicitly about bikers, which means the state will have trouble classifying it as a gang without losing more legitimacy. And we get to use madmax memes for free, seeing as half our side practically believes its the apocalypse and bolshevism is taking over anyway (and it may well be, who knows). The image macros write themselves. But it also means geographic organization is now plausible. And federal informants/infiltrators/entrapment officers are all easily identifiable by their rides. It also means we are. But hypothetically thats a good thing anyway, because now more than ever we need to visibily *show* our strength in numbers, because anonymity is just being used to cast us as terrorists rather than patriots. The three percenters went public and it actually did a lot to insulate them from the occupation's suppression tactics. This is that, but non-militant. The other thing is this makes sign-drops or protests/picketing easy: put em right on your vehicle. Fed-hired street thugs cant be used to rip down the signs because we can just move it faster than they can show up. The avoidance of violence, combine with high-impact visibility (using a motorcade) projects strength and level-headedness both of which are hugely appealing to the middle. The middle is the biggest necessary component of the public to influence if we want to force the hand of the occupation (spy agencies, banks) and its gatekeepers (DNC, their lackies the GOP, wallstreet, social media, news complex, etc) on policy matters. If we combine it with support for veterans and a handpicked set of pastors we have a sufficiently powerful coalition to blockbust the false evangelical movement and cut off the state's terror-propaganda being used to cow the libertarian/moderate left into compliance.

(post is archived)

You can claim this sub in /s/subrequest