WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.4K

Think about it.

"Militia" is a word that the propaganda of the regime has primed the public to respond to in a certain way.

The very idea of them being organized damages them, because once percieved as organized, guess what? Some actors at the federal level are forced to either spend political capital explaining why they're doing nothing about the org, or go after them.

Thats why they were so adamant about being portrayed as a "loose movement" and "abstract political ideology" and other buzzwords. Because once the enemy is identities, it gives the opposition (us) something and someone to push against. And then it forces their enablers in the GOP, working for the DNC regime, to punt, and either do something, or lose more credibility. Rock meet hard place.

If we want them to do anything, the trick is to force them to play ball or reveal the game they're playing. And when the occupation is forced to pretend-fight itself and nothing happens, it is forced to lose more credibility with the public. It destabilizes the regime.

So call them what they are, to implicitly highlight the contradiction between how the state persecutes moderate, libertarian, and conservative americans, versus how the state enables and refuses to go after the goons, rats, and virtue-signalling psychos that support it.

Call them what they are:

"A militia."

yes its demonizing the term, but the term is already horribly demonzied. And the practice itself is infiltrated, shutdown, suppressed, and manipulated anyway. Doesn't serve us anymore.

So push through the negate long and hard enough into its opposite.

Antifa/BLM are a "radical fascist militia".

It will also alienate people on the fence, who are taken in by the big lie that they're "anti-fascist because its in the name!"

Counter the big lie with big truth.

Better yet.

Call them radical rightwing militias.

Watch this be massively amplified by their attempt to overcorrect, combine with the bizareness of the accusation.

Do not make the enemy merely follow their own rules. Make them follow the rules they force on us. And do not make the enemy adhere to the labels they attribute to all of us to demonize us.

No. Make the enemy adhere to the same labels.

This way every time they try to gimp us. Every time they try to demonize us. They cut their noses to spite their faces.

The left are a "radical left/rightwing socialist/bolshevik militia".

If at all possible, use that phrase frequently, and vehemently.

And what they are accused of, they will either cease doing, or it will cause them to double down and lose the middle even further, which will also force those on the fence to choose between sides.

Don't polarize the public. Force the enemy into a position where their own actions do it for you.

Meanwhile we should be using the very same language they use to describe themselves: "a set of ideologies", "common ideals", "coalitions", "loose affiliation", "loose movement scattered across the nation".

Think about it. "Militia" is a word that the propaganda of the regime has primed the public to respond to in a certain way. The very idea of them being organized damages them, because once percieved as organized, guess what? Some actors at the federal level are forced to either spend political capital explaining why they're doing nothing about the org, or go after them. Thats why they were so adamant about being portrayed as a "loose movement" and "abstract political ideology" and other buzzwords. Because once the enemy is identities, it gives the opposition (us) something and someone to push against. And then it forces their enablers in the GOP, working for the DNC regime, to punt, and either do something, or lose more credibility. Rock meet hard place. If we want them to do anything, the trick is to force them to play ball or reveal the game they're playing. And when the occupation is forced to pretend-fight itself and nothing happens, it is forced to lose more credibility with the public. It destabilizes the regime. So call them what they are, to implicitly highlight the contradiction between how the state persecutes moderate, libertarian, and conservative americans, versus how the state enables and refuses to go after the goons, rats, and virtue-signalling psychos that support it. Call them what they are: "A militia." yes its demonizing the term, but the term is *already* horribly demonzied. And the practice itself is infiltrated, shutdown, suppressed, and manipulated anyway. Doesn't serve us anymore. So push through the negate long and hard enough into its opposite. Antifa/BLM are a "radical fascist militia". It will also alienate people on the fence, who are taken in by the big lie that they're "anti-fascist because its in the name!" Counter the big lie with big truth. Better yet. Call them radical *rightwing* militias. Watch this be massively amplified by their attempt to overcorrect, combine with the bizareness of the accusation. Do not make the enemy merely follow their *own* rules. Make them follow the rules they force on *us*. And do not make the enemy adhere to the labels they attribute to all of us to demonize us. No. Make the enemy adhere to *the same labels*. This way every time they try to gimp us. Every time they try to demonize us. They cut their noses to spite their faces. The left are a "radical left/rightwing socialist/bolshevik militia". If at all possible, use that phrase frequently, and vehemently. And what they are accused of, they will either cease doing, or it will cause them to double down and lose the middle even further, which will also force those on the fence to choose between sides. Don't polarize the public. Force the enemy into a position where their own actions do it for you. Meanwhile we should be using the very same language they use to describe themselves: "a set of ideologies", "common ideals", "coalitions", "loose affiliation", "loose movement scattered across the nation".

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

Calling them a militia legitimizes them and gets right wing normies less accepting of militias as a concept, using the same language as them to describe ourselves is a good idea though.