i think you're wrong here.
it was over before defense even called a witness.
we'll know shortly though one way or the other.
i think you're wrong here.
it was over before defense even called a witness.
we'll know shortly though one way or the other.
It is not whether it was over before it even began.
It is whether the outcome was predetermine.
I argue it is, and the outcome in question is not in his favor.
There is very little to suggest otherwise save for headlines about the judge and his blustering.
And that fits the standard menshevik RNC playbook to a 't'. Bluster and then compromise or sell out.
Think about it, then you decide.
It is not whether it was over before it even began.
It is whether the outcome was *predetermine*.
I argue it is, and the outcome in question is not in his favor.
There is very little to suggest otherwise save for headlines about the judge and his blustering.
And that fits the standard ~~menshevik~~ RNC playbook to a 't'. Bluster and then compromise or sell out.
Think about it, then you decide.
:)
:)
It's a good day to celebrate.
It's a good day to celebrate.
Exactly why people were bemoaning the defense dragging this shit out. A lot of the testimony was confusing and implied asking the jurors to interpret the law.
Exactly why people were bemoaning the defense dragging this shit out. A lot of the testimony was confusing and implied asking the jurors to interpret the law.
(post is archived)