Calling someone who has not used mRNA "vaccine" a pureblood is accurate imho.
My perspective is different. Don't buy into the leftist world-view even one bit. Don't play their game. If they call you a racist, say "yes, I am a racist" with confidence.
"Naturally immune" or fuck off.
I prefer to use whatever words I want.
If we have the same end goal, let's work together. I am no shill, and very anti-marxist.
I could very easily argue the opposite and call you a shill for fostering division among us.
My only point is that using pureblood does not automatically mean someone is a shill.
My only point is that using pureblood does not automatically mean someone is a shill.
It showed up as a meme one week after "naturally immune" started doing damage to the narrative.
It was 100% diversion.
The media tried to boost the meme with retarded articles about "muh dangerous new white supreeemacyst trend, 'pure blood', and why everyone unjabbed are terrorists."
It originated with online shills, was pushed by shills, and is being amplified by shills.
The design of it is to alienate the middle, and thats all it is.
The state would like nothing more than "naturally immune" to be replaced by "pure blood", so they can all label us as a dangerous cult for real, and get on with the next stage of demonization.
No thank you.
I could very easily argue the opposite and call you a shill for fostering division among us.
Projection denied.
"Naturally immune" is a health status.
"pureblood" is a identity, and a label, legit division tactics.
See, you are pissing a lot of people off.
This is not necessary.
If you had worded your post less aggressively then perhaps people would try harder to see if you had a point.
See, you are pissing a lot of people off. If you had worded your post less aggressively then perhaps people would try harder to see if you had a point.
I'll piss off as many or as few people as I piss off. I'm not mincing my words just because someone else doesn't like it.
(post is archived)