Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

648

Last two weeks: nuclear war Four weeks ago: mass shootings and gun control Six weeks ago: abortion.

I may have got the order wrong but I think those three were the last three news cycles.

Anyone have more?

If we understand what the issue upcoming is, and what the previous news cycles ere, we can artificially lengthen or shorten the transition. The result is a disruption of the news-making process that the state propaganda (cnn, foxnews, social media) operations are pushing.

If this is disrupted (not even shut down, simply disrupted), it is a dagger straight to the heart of the regime's control.

You can destabilize the u.s. or any other western nation's ability to act in the crises they create, simply by interfering with public awareness. The more this happens the more it will delegitimize them, and increase infighting between the opportunistic elements of the uniparty's wings. The more infighting occurs, the more people reject the normal political process. This feeds right back into the de-legitimization effort. It's self-fulfilling past a certain threshold.

Explain in a following post how we might do this

Last two weeks: nuclear war Four weeks ago: mass shootings and gun control Six weeks ago: abortion. I may have got the order wrong but I think those three were the last three news cycles. Anyone have more? If we understand what the issue upcoming is, and what the previous news cycles ere, we can artificially lengthen or shorten the transition. The result is a disruption of the news-making process that the state propaganda (cnn, foxnews, social media) operations are pushing. If this is disrupted (not even shut down, simply disrupted), it is a dagger straight to the heart of the regime's control. You can destabilize the u.s. or any other western nation's ability to act in the crises they create, simply by interfering with public awareness. The more this happens the more it will delegitimize them, and increase infighting between the opportunistic elements of the uniparty's wings. The more infighting occurs, the more people reject the normal political process. This feeds right back into the de-legitimization effort. It's self-fulfilling past a certain threshold. Explain in a following post how we might do this

(post is archived)

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

One of the ways is to create a fake story that they will be sure to glom onto. Then quickly debunk it and thereby making them look like the idiots that they are. Here is an example: Trump is the sole beneficiary of Ivanka's will.

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

If this is disrupted (not even shut down, simply disrupted), it is a dagger straight to the heart of the regime's control.

Why? Their narratives overlap. You forgot monkeypox, SADS, Russia, and the latest COVID "variant", btw.

Right now they are pushing: SADS, monkeypox, another SARS "variant", Russia, nuclear war, gun control, "green agenda", and abortion at the same time. They just vary the magnification day to day, week to week. All things people are encouraged to fear. That's the common denominator.

[–] • 0 pt

They just vary the magnification day to day, week to week. All things people are encouraged to fear. That's the common denominator.

I think this is sort of a recent phenomenon.

It used to be once a story was out of the news cycle, it was all but dead.

Like they figured out they can shift about and backtrack when needed. You're right about that.

How long ago did this really kick into gear as a tactic though? I can't believe I missed it.

[–] • 0 pt

How long ago did this really kick into gear as a tactic though? I can't believe I missed it.

When broadcast TV was overtaken by the internet as a news source.