Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

838
•
Pending Sfw/Nsfl/Nsfw

When posting, if you fail to choose NAFL/NSFW there is Conway to go back and flag the post with the option for NSFL or NSFW.

You can only edit the post and then click the NSFW yes/no after it’s posted.

When posting, if you fail to choose NAFL/NSFW there is Conway to go back and flag the post with the option for NSFL or NSFW. You can only edit the post and then click the NSFW yes/no after it’s posted.
[–] • 1 pt

Once tagged a post’s tag can’t be reverted.

Since SFW/NSFL are public, only NSFW can be enabled after posting, in case the OP realizes the content is actually NSFW.

[–] • 1 pt

I didn't want to revert.

I guess I fail to see the logic of not being able to flag it any other way than NSFW after the fact. I get its SFW to start, but why not have a method to change the flag? Even if NSFL is public, the function of adding something that is available at post time should be available? No?

[–] • 0 pt

Don’t you explicitly check the content of a link/video/pic to know what type of tag it requires before posting? That’s what the tag selection in the create post page is for.

[–] • 1 pt

Yeah. If one fails to do it at inception, one can’t pick NSFL after the fact.

It makes no sense to me that one function is not avaliable on edit but another is. Yeah it more programming on your part as you need a selection over a simple click and verify.

But shit happens and sometimes things get posted and need to be edited. You’d thing it would follow the title edit logic, can do working a certain timer.

You used NSFW as a gate keeping method which was brilliant.

Adding nsfl as discussed in that post should be higher than for work, but then you’d fuck up all the previous nsfw.

Now the logical level of nsfw and nafl is flipped, and you can’t flag it nsfl after the fact but you can flag nsfw.

I won’t go into it being half hatch to start.

It was a brilliant idea to start that has turned into a non logical selection choice that can’t be edited after the fact.

I can’t see it’s by design to not have it, and realize the coding is much more to fix that edit part. But justifying the lack of it it to cover the lack of logic is, well, not logical.

I consider it a bug, maybe to consider it a feature. Well cool feature bro.