Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] • 7 pts

Capitalism with government intervention, maybe.

Look at Capitalism in 1950 to see how it should work.

[–] • 4 pts

Capitalism void of greedy people, aka Jews

[–] • 2 pts

Hard to compare 1950's to any other period though, one of the few times with established global trade in place and 2/3rds of the world rebuilding and in need of stuff.

We had a worldwide captive market and could capitalize on that regardless of our policy strengths or weaknesses.

[+] [deleted] • 2 pts
[–] • 0 pt

That's misinformation. If it really were like this, once Europe rebuilt US + Europe should be even stronger via mutual trade. Not bringing the US back down. The system is all about robbing us as much as possible.

[–] • 0 pt

Yeah, and the bottom one could easily be labeled anarcho-capitalism.

[–] • 0 pt

I'd aim for something without a central bank and fiat currency. National protectionism with internal ruthless capitalism, restricting businesses from harming people and the environment without the government protections they currently have(monopolies and exemptions from harm) as well as holding business owners personally responsible for the bullshit they try to pull off and blame on the janitor or somesuch.

And I'm not sure if something like the stock market should even exist, no matter how much money it makes for the rich.

[–] • 4 pts

National socialism is still socialism. What we need is a deglobalised return to national capitalism where hard work is rewarded and that's just not going to happen without the full system collapsing first.

[–] • 0 pt

National Socialism has nothing to do with Socialism (Marxism), it is a direct response to it. They are politically opposed ideologies.

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

Is an administrative agency with law enforcement backing forcibly taking something from someone to give to someone else, not for the common but for the individual good?

Then it's fucking socialism. Earn your own shit.

The pic is missing the blowout view of the guard towers aiming automatic remote firing howitzers at the workers.

[–] • 0 pt

You don't know your history faggot.

[–] • 3 pts

Capitalism with actual property rights, no income taxes and no property taxes. No permits necessary for driving/running a business.

[+] [deleted] • 0 pt
[+] [deleted] • 2 pts
[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

Are they digging mass graves for jews?

[–] • 1 pt

muh capitalism is bad because jews told me it was

Stop depicting capitalism in a manner in which a jew approves of.

[–] • 0 pt

Would never happen in America. You would have to get rid of 90% or more of the population. People of pure Nordic descent are very small in number. It would be better to move to the Nordic country you descended from and save your people and your native land from the Marxists who are destroying it.

[–] • 0 pt

The top background images are swapped.

[–] • 0 pt

No, it's a famous National Socialist propaganda poster, but I can understand why you would be mistaken.

[–] • 0 pt

Doesn't look like I'm mistaken. The hammer and sickle appear under the "Capitalism" side while the flag of the US and GB appear under the "Communist" side.

Explain this logic.

[–] • 1 pt

I don’t think the person making the meme thought that much into it but I do see your point. It does kinda look weird. Maybe they did that on purpose to symbolize that both are the same?

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

I explained this above, look more closely.

This picture is the background you are seeing. http://stmedia.stimg.co/propaganda+gal060117+14.JPG?w=2000

[–] • 0 pt

Everyone has guns in libertarian capitalism. In socialism the government takes the guns from the people.

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

Yes, communists take guns away. National Socialists do not.

[–] • 0 pt

National socialism is an authoritarian system. Authoritarian governments must retain their authority by being much better armed than the population.

Another issue with the graphic is that capitalism doesn't have a centralized authority that dictates what people do - it's more like the bottom graphic.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

It is only authoritarian in its duty, which is to preserve the nation and it's people. National Socialism is not interested in restricting people's freedoms in any regard, so long as the behavior is traditional and not degenerate or dangerous to the culture that they need to protect.

National Socialism is nature, it follows natural law.

[–] • 0 pt

Fuck socialists The only reason NatSoc worked for Hitler was because it was propped up by ethnocentric fascism. Not saying it didnt work because it obviously did, but as an american I yearn for what the founding fathers intended for us