WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

460

Analytical Vs Intuitive minds - why equilibrium is not for everybody:

Intuitive: The extremely "intuitive" person is one who makes decisions and evaluates things based on few parameters. They may even at times ignore facts, or what appears to be facts, if they have a suspiction they know the right answer. Many times they do and this can be a valuable trait, especially in some jobs where there may be few facts and little information available to evaluate and the person is well versed, or even and "expert" in the field. The very intuitive person usually won't spend a lot of time analyzing things and may get easily frustrated when forced to analyze things where they feel they already know the answer or best way.

Analytical: The highly "analytical" person can often be characterized by "analysis paralysis". This kind of person is the most prone to be extremely analytical. They don't accept hardly anything at face value and will normally not make decision until they have all of the facts and figures, and then still may not be completely satisfied. A high level of detail orientation and patience are also commonly associated with this trait. This can be a very valuable asset in many job positions where all sides of an issue must be thoroughly explored before making a decision or moving on.

Because of this it is very easy to understand that intuitive people are very good at understanding if there is a conspiracy behind certain phenomenons, and why other analytical people are prone to not understand if there is a conspiracy. Obviously when discussing conspiracies, an analytical person will never agree with an intuitive person, unless the conspiracy is exposed with the whole set of proofs.


Graphic explanation of how Analytical Vs Intuitive minds work:

Analytical mind needs the whole A B C D to find the final D.

Intuitive mind needs only A to find and go directly to the final D

**Analytical Vs Intuitive minds - why equilibrium is not for everybody:** **Intuitive:** The extremely "intuitive" person is one who makes decisions and evaluates things based on few parameters. They may even at times ignore facts, or what appears to be facts, if they have a suspiction they know the right answer. Many times they do and this can be a valuable trait, especially in some jobs where there may be few facts and little information available to evaluate and the person is well versed, or even and "expert" in the field. The very intuitive person usually won't spend a lot of time analyzing things and may get easily frustrated when forced to analyze things where they feel they already know the answer or best way. **Analytical:** The highly "analytical" person can often be characterized by "analysis paralysis". This kind of person is the most prone to be extremely analytical. They don't accept hardly anything at face value and will normally not make decision until they have all of the facts and figures, and then still may not be completely satisfied. A high level of detail orientation and patience are also commonly associated with this trait. This can be a very valuable asset in many job positions where all sides of an issue must be thoroughly explored before making a decision or moving on. **Because** of this it is very easy to understand that intuitive people are very good at understanding if there is a conspiracy behind certain phenomenons, and why other analytical people are prone to not understand if there is a conspiracy. Obviously when discussing conspiracies, an analytical person will never agree with an intuitive person, unless the conspiracy is exposed with the whole set of proofs. *** **Graphic explanation of how Analytical Vs Intuitive minds work:** Analytical mind needs the whole A B C D to find the final D. Intuitive mind needs only A to find and go directly to the final D

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

Thats why you need both. Intuition is great, but can be misled. Without analyzing a conspiracy and by just going off of intuition or belief, you're subject to disinfo and manipulation whereas someone who actually analyzes facts/info could fare better.

[–] 0 pt

depends on ones level of intuition, eh?