IIRC, that story had nothing to do with Q - In fact, that rumor started after the election when they were trying to smear Sidney Powell: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/sidney-powell-tried-to-get-the-dod-to-rescue-the-cia-director-citing-a-qanon-conspiracy-theory-that-claimed-she-was-captured-in-germany-book-says/ar-AAQO4Jl
Excerpt (emphasis mine)
The former Trump lawyer Sidney Powell called a Pentagon official demanding a mission to save the CIA director last year, citing a false QAnon conspiracy theory, according to a new book.
In "Betrayal," excerpts of which were published by ABC News, the journalist Jonathan Karlwrote that Powell phoned Ezra Cohen, a senior Department of Defense official, shortly after the 2020 election claiming that CIA Director Gina Haspel was in danger.
"Gina Haspel has been hurt and taken into custody in Germany," Powell told Cohen on the call, according to Karl's book. "You need to launch a special operations mission to get her."
I don't recall Gina being a white hat. I thought she was [playing for the other side the whole time. Perhaps she'll get a discount on lawyers now. She's going to need it.
Haspel was never a white hat, IMO. Does my comment suggest that she is? If so, I need to edit it.
No I was agreeing with your comment. Seemed to me OP thought she was? Maybe I misunderstood.
Right, never a white hat.
that.s why I said under the banner of Q, not that Q said it
IMO it was considered a rumor and speculation and nothing more. In fact, I think Simon Parkes jumped on that bandwagon and many were put off by it.
You post some good stuff here - I think we want the same basic things for our country and the world and prefer to focus on that.
Thanks. Yes lets continue the good fight. I forgot all about nutty Simon Parkes already. What happened to him? Did his alien dad take him off world?
that.s why I said under the banner of Q, not that Q said it
Oh, well the headline is confusing, sounds exactly like you're saying don't trust Q lol (and that didn't sound like you so I was confused).
No I think the idea is that it hurts the credibility of Q when a huge percentage of the people who say he is “real“ (whatever that means to each individual) are constantly wrong about everything. I know when the whole thing started I was on board. The more and more I saw false predictions, false claims, bad information, incredibly crazy theories that were never even close to true, it made me start to doubt. It happens to Christians sometimes too, where if they notice that most of the Christians in their lives are judgmental, evil, or Catholic child molesters, they begin to lose their faith. Because how can all of these people believe in anything that could possibly be real if they are wrong all the time and lie, change the rules, shift goalpost, it’s tough.
I get it. The title was worded in a way that created some misunderstanding - glad we discussed it in a constructive way - most of us, anyway.
Relocation imminent? Conspiracy risk. End (for now). Haspel must find & term clas program. She knows.
I guess she's back. Popcorn ready!
Here's the hand wringing. If it isn't a Q post it isn't under the banner of Q. Random retards saying random shit is meaningless.
so sad that you don't know what "under the banner [of anything]" means.
Powell is an especially retarded clown, because the narrative at the time was that special operations had engaged her (Haspel's) agents in a firefight and taken her into military custody to be tried at Gitmo.
But did Powell ever make a public statement about that, or was it simply reported in the book? I don't remember her saying anything, but maybe I missed it.
is a shill. Not worth talking to.
I don't give a fuck what Powell says. The Qtard narrative was that Haspel was involved in rigging the election and military SF had captured her and the servers in Germany. Powell doesn't even have that right. She's another disinfo clown.
(post is archived)