WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

104

Let me preface this by stating the Covid stuff is not my area of expertise. I believe that Covid was manufactured as a bioweapon, and I won't touch the jab with a ten-foot pole - and that is the extent of my opinion on the Covid debacle. My sister, on the other hand, is hot on top of the Covid mess, so I asked her opinion. She sent me this from a chemical engineer in whom she has a good degree of trust.

I'm not saying he's right or wrong - I have NO idea. I'm simply presenting the information as another perspective for those who might be interested. Please keep that in mind as you read and comment. Thank you.

Greetings All, I have plowed through the first two Dr Ardis videos (Dr Ardis Part 2/3 on Brighteon, hope to get to the last one later tonight. I will probably be writing more on this subject as it develops and I find the time, but the bottom line is COVID is not snake venom. Snake venom contains several types of neurotoxins, and these proteins are shared with spiders, fish, probably some other life forms I am not aware of. The proteins are the toxic agents. There are not nearly enough snakes to use for a world wide 'vaccination' program involving millions of doses (even at the tiny levels of micrograms involved) and billions of dollars. The genes (mRNA segments) which code for making these proteins are found in some viruses, notably the HIV virus. I suspect that the HIV virus itself is bioengineered, and those gene segments may have been borrowed from some snake. Viruses borrow segments from each other all the time, and with CRISPR now known (the process cells use for shuffling >and recombining such genetic information bits), the bioweapons team can assist in making swaps and borrowings which cause 'gain of function,' which just means adding a function which was not there previously.

Since the same research teams have been studying snake venom, CRISPR, vaccines, and now COVID, it is not a great stretch to assume that someone noticed that some snake venom causes blood clotting, and decided to include the gene for such a protein in a viral carrier, pretending that they were trying to create an anti-venom vaccine (later called COVID). There are several very poisonous, meaning very effective at causing death, proteins found in snake venom, and it would not be hard to insert them into a coronavirus genome. The proteins are the key, not the snake.

Ardis himself points out that one class of snakes (cobras) cause blood thinning and hemorrhages, while another snake class (kraits) cause clotting. The fact that snake venom antibodies work on COVID symptom modalities merely indicates that the same proteins are involved. But the Jab mRNA is centered on the Gp120 (spike) protein and the 16 AIDS proteins borrowed from the HIV virus. The process for synthesizing the 'vaccine' nanoparticles starts with PCR multiplication of these mRNA segments. No snakes are involved. Ardis seems to have forgotten that correlation is not causation. The correlation between snake bite symptoms and COVID is due to these same proteins being involved.

A point which Ardis glibly glosses over is the longevity of the snake venom mRNA, and this could be an important issue. No doubt the snake developed (by internal CRISPR mechanism) the venom proteins which protect mRNA, and realized their value and kept them for that purpose, only later discovering that they had fatal effects on non-self. Bioweapons workers have struggled for decades to find a way to protect mRNA in their gene therapy shots, and are presently using pseudouradylation. This protects the mRNA inside the cell; the nanoparticle polyethylene glycol membrane coating protects it until delivery into the cell. These mechanisms would not be sufficient to distribute mRNA through the public water system. I don't see the snake venom proteins being sufficient for this purpose either, but those bioweapons workers are diligent, and if there is a way, they will find it, as long as Fraudci keeps the $9B in annual public money funneled to their labs.

So Dr Ardis has discovered the source of some part of the Jab weapon design, and enjoys his 15 minutes of fame, and the link to the serpent story in the Bible causes his video to go viral. But he does a disservice to the public by saying COVID is snake venom: it definitely is not.

Fred

Let me preface this by stating the Covid stuff is not my area of expertise. I believe that Covid was manufactured as a bioweapon, and I won't touch the jab with a ten-foot pole - and that is the extent of my opinion on the Covid debacle. My sister, on the other hand, is hot on top of the Covid mess, so I asked her opinion. She sent me this from a chemical engineer in whom she has a good degree of trust. I'm not saying he's right or wrong - I have NO idea. I'm simply presenting the information as another perspective for those who might be interested. Please keep that in mind as you read and comment. Thank you. >Greetings All, >I have plowed through the first two Dr Ardis videos (Dr Ardis Part 2/3 on Brighteon, hope to get to the last one later tonight. I will probably be writing more on this subject as it develops and I find the time, but the bottom line is COVID is not snake venom. Snake venom contains several types of neurotoxins, and these proteins are shared with spiders, fish, probably some other life forms I am not aware of. The proteins are the toxic agents. There are not nearly enough snakes to use for a world wide 'vaccination' program involving millions of doses (even at the tiny levels of micrograms involved) and billions of dollars. The genes (mRNA segments) which code for making these proteins are found in some viruses, notably the HIV virus. I suspect that the HIV virus itself is bioengineered, and those gene segments may have been borrowed from some snake. Viruses borrow segments from each other all the time, and with CRISPR now known (the process cells use for shuffling >and recombining such genetic information bits), the bioweapons team can assist in making swaps and borrowings which cause 'gain of function,' which just means adding a function which was not there previously. >Since the same research teams have been studying snake venom, CRISPR, vaccines, and now COVID, it is not a great stretch to assume that someone noticed that some snake venom causes blood clotting, and decided to include the gene for such a protein in a viral carrier, pretending that they were trying to create an anti-venom vaccine (later called COVID). There are several very poisonous, meaning very effective at causing death, proteins found in snake venom, and it would not be hard to insert them into a coronavirus genome. The proteins are the key, not the snake. >Ardis himself points out that one class of snakes (cobras) cause blood thinning and hemorrhages, while another snake class (kraits) cause clotting. The fact that snake venom antibodies work on COVID symptom modalities merely indicates that the same proteins are involved. But the Jab mRNA is centered on the Gp120 (spike) protein and the 16 AIDS proteins borrowed from the HIV virus. The process for synthesizing the 'vaccine' nanoparticles starts with PCR multiplication of these mRNA segments. No snakes are involved. Ardis seems to have forgotten that correlation is not causation. The correlation between snake bite symptoms and COVID is due to these same proteins being involved. >A point which Ardis glibly glosses over is the longevity of the snake venom mRNA, and this could be an important issue. No doubt the snake developed (by internal CRISPR mechanism) the venom proteins which protect mRNA, and realized their value and kept them for that purpose, only later discovering that they had fatal effects on non-self. Bioweapons workers have struggled for decades to find a way to protect mRNA in their gene therapy shots, and are presently using pseudouradylation. This protects the mRNA inside the cell; the nanoparticle polyethylene glycol membrane coating protects it until delivery into the cell. These mechanisms would not be sufficient to distribute mRNA through the public water system. I don't see the snake venom proteins being sufficient for this purpose either, but those bioweapons workers are diligent, and if there is a way, they will find it, as long as Fraudci keeps the $9B in annual public money funneled to their labs. >So Dr Ardis has discovered the source of some part of the Jab weapon design, and enjoys his 15 minutes of fame, and the link to the serpent story in the Bible causes his video to go viral. But he does a disservice to the public by saying COVID is snake venom: it definitely is not. >Fred

(post is archived)

[–] 3 pts (edited )

Yes, i don't understand how that was completely missed and was a cogent part of his argument. Not to say whether the argument is wrong (it's not imo) but suggesting there are not enough snakes to be able to manufacture the required amount of snake venom isn't entirely accurate.

EDIT : Not sure the HIV bio-engineered is actually bs. There is considerable credible evidence purporting or showing HIV to be entirely bio-engineered via Dr Gallo - i actually thought this was fairly common knowledge (Fauci is in the background with NIH/ Military funding iirc and then Fauci came to public prominence pushing the disaterous HIV drug AZT in response to this 'out of nowhere killer disease that has no cure' while AZT was akin to killing 1'000 people to save just one - intubation and remdiservir anyone) and being called out by a 'whistle blower' Dr (who wrote a book on it) and confronted Dr Gallo from the audience with questions about his role in it's development during a filmed public appearance Q and A on HIV drug treatments or something and where DR Gallo (provably) lied about each and every question or claim put to him . The clips are probably still on ytube (buts it been a while since i watched them)

[–] 0 pt

I interpreted his statement about the number of snakes needed as an attempt to point out that some people interpreted Ardis' statements to mean that they were literally milking snake venom and putting it in the jab, and that, in his opinion, that is not what is happening..

[–] 0 pt

Yeah i kinda see how Ardis's explanation could be confused as himself arguing for the belief as literally milking snakes - but yes, imo that's an inaccurate reading although Aardi didn't really do himself any favors in how he explained it. We understood it, others might not have. Synthetic would be the way to accomplish any mass production . To clarify my edit, his beginning statement claiming there wasn't the technology to be able to bio-engineer HIV is imho demonstrably and provably false.