wait, do you actually believe we are spinning 1,000 miles per hour, the horizon(horizantal) is a curve and the plane or planet is a sphere? do you believe in CGI and globes in kindigarten?

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.

Click here to see all the comments (44).

[–] • 0 pt

This is so fucking pointless...

You can watch a guy covered in red bull logos free fall from a weather balloon so high you can see the curvature of the earth as a single live (at the time) clip. I do not have hundreds of thousands of dollars to spend on sky diving but I don't need to, to know the earth is a sphere.

PHYSICALLY

"You haven't PHYSICALLY walked the entire surface of the earth yourself therefore I am right!" How about you PHYSICALLY prove that it's flat, pick a direction and go find the fucking edge. When you find it you give me a call umm'kay?

I have no idea what the hell you're rambling about a reflector on the moon or what the hell that has do with a price of a hooker in Albuquerque.

I have dealt with your kind before. There is a reflector that NASA left on the moon so it could be laser ranged. Flat earth doesn't stop at the earth, you have to account for the existence of the moon and it's orbit and the fact that it is clearly spherical and the phase and position of the moon correspond to the orbits of both the earth around the sun and the moon around the earth.

No they don't. This is another reason why I question the heliocentric model. They do rotate that's true but they haven't changed since man has begun documenting it. They say we're spinning on our axis at 1.4 times the speed of sound while whipping around the sun at over 66,000mph which is whipping around the galaxy over 500,000mph yet the constellations remain the same.

Not only does the night sky appear to rotate around us throughout the year (because we are rotating around the sun) but the stars do shift in position over millennia due to the earths axis varying and you can see this when you compare ancient star charts and things like stone henge and a giza which had markers for stars that have since shifted. Even the astrological signs are getting rather inaccurate based on the actual current day ecliptic, if you are a Pisces you are probably actually an Aries. Also if earth were flat the people in the Southern hemisphere would see the same night sky as those in the North but they don't because its a fucking sphere.

Where? NASA has never been able to produce one single (I'm going to use that word again) PHYSICAL evidence. You damned straight I'm going call bullshit on their CGI. Robert Simmons admits that the "Blue Marble" that became famous was photo-shopped. He even explains in this video how he faked clouds and everything.

He's talking about how he combined data from various sources and images to create a high res rendering of the earth. Nevermind that's it's also not the original photo, even the clip says this is "blue marble 2.0" The 'damning' line is offered up with full transparency "It's photo shopped, it has to be." and then he explains why.

This is so fucking pointless... You can watch a guy covered in red bull logos free fall from a weather balloon so high you can see the curvature of the earth as a single live (at the time) clip. I do not have hundreds of thousands of dollars to spend on sky diving but I don't need to, to know the earth is a sphere. > PHYSICALLY "You haven't PHYSICALLY walked the entire surface of the earth yourself therefore I am right!" How about you PHYSICALLY prove that it's flat, pick a direction and go find the fucking edge. When you find it you give me a call umm'kay? > I have no idea what the hell you're rambling about a reflector on the moon or what the hell that has do with a price of a hooker in Albuquerque. I have dealt with your kind before. There is a reflector that NASA left on the moon so it could be laser ranged. Flat earth doesn't stop at the earth, you have to account for the existence of the moon and it's orbit and the fact that it is clearly spherical and the phase and position of the moon correspond to the orbits of both the earth around the sun and the moon around the earth. > No they don't. This is another reason why I question the heliocentric model. They do rotate that's true but they haven't changed since man has begun documenting it. They say we're spinning on our axis at 1.4 times the speed of sound while whipping around the sun at over 66,000mph which is whipping around the galaxy over 500,000mph yet the constellations remain the same. Not only does the night sky appear to rotate around us throughout the year (because we are rotating around the sun) but the stars do shift in position over millennia due to the earths axis varying and you can see this when you compare ancient star charts and things like stone henge and a giza which had markers for stars that have since shifted. Even the astrological signs are getting rather inaccurate based on the actual current day ecliptic, if you are a Pisces you are probably actually an Aries. Also if earth were flat the people in the Southern hemisphere would see the same night sky as those in the North but they don't because its a fucking sphere. > Where? NASA has never been able to produce one single (I'm going to use that word again) PHYSICAL evidence. You damned straight I'm going call bullshit on their CGI. Robert Simmons admits that the "Blue Marble" that became famous was photo-shopped. He even explains in this video how he faked clouds and everything. He's talking about how he combined data from various sources and images to create a high res rendering of the earth. Nevermind that's it's also not the original photo, even the clip says this is "blue marble 2.0" The 'damning' line is offered up with full transparency "It's photo shopped, it has to be." and then he explains why.

parent
link

(post is archived)

You can claim this sub in /s/subrequest