WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

948

I find their product lines are turning to complete shit, and even what should be stable products have turned to crap

  • Xamarin, just no words. Clearly this product line was torched and the users were told to go pound sand
  • MAUI is an epic dumpster fire, it's so bad even MS decided specifically NOT to use it for their new product lines
  • Avalonia/ WPF2. Why is this even a thing if Web Assembly is now being pushed. Also, I can think of way better frameworks that do the job of desktop, without the extra hassle (Electron, Flutter)
  • Blazor was so unstable last year I got laughed at by an MS engineer in an MS interview ... for using Blazor. They were shocked someone would use it for a production app ....
  • The shift from .NET framework will be supported, to LOL screw you no more .NET framework because .NET Core
  • Most competitors have shown that MS is a complete dumpster fire of a company and that a lot of their product lines are over engineered, bloated and all over the place. I also find no one wants .NET Devs anymore, especially when there are multiple platforms that do a better job and are cheaper.
  • The running joke was the .NET timer library, and multi thread support, where there was 3+ libraries for each because separate teams all rolled their own.
I find their product lines are turning to complete shit, and even what should be stable products have turned to crap * Xamarin, just no words. Clearly this product line was torched and the users were told to go pound sand * MAUI is an epic dumpster fire, it's so bad even MS decided specifically NOT to use it for their new product lines * Avalonia/ WPF2. Why is this even a thing if Web Assembly is now being pushed. Also, I can think of way better frameworks that do the job of desktop, without the extra hassle (Electron, Flutter) * Blazor was so unstable last year I got laughed at by an MS engineer in an MS interview ... for using Blazor. They were shocked someone would use it for a production app .... * The shift from .NET framework will be supported, to LOL screw you no more .NET framework because .NET Core * Most competitors have shown that MS is a complete dumpster fire of a company and that a lot of their product lines are over engineered, bloated and all over the place. I also find no one wants .NET Devs anymore, especially when there are multiple platforms that do a better job and are cheaper. * The running joke was the .NET timer library, and multi thread support, where there was 3+ libraries for each because separate teams all rolled their own.

(post is archived)

[–] 3 pts

All modern development tools, frameworks and languages are complete shit. I've been programming for four decades and all this new stuff is a total train wreck. You didn't really say what you thought is better, except for Electron and Flutter, but if those are indications of what you think is vastly better, then I don't think very highly of your opinion here. So what else do you think is so great about other products and technologies? And what kinds of applications are you developing anyway since that makes this discussion more relevant?

[–] 4 pts

Dude! Why are you so homophobic?

Swift is a fagtastic language if you’re a pajeet and love crApple faggotry.

[–] 1 pt

Oh by gosh will Krishna please help me make this user understand that the swift language is wonderful.

Electron/flutter was more to highlight a comparable market to what MS is trying to compete against. My favorite tech stacks in no particular order are Google Go, Rust, C++, Bash and Erlang. Ironically the best IDE I used was neovim with some plugins, because I rage quit on VS Code at the time. The thing is with Erlang and Phoenix, one can build magical apps in no time. With Go, one can build scallable systems easily. With Rust, concurrency and high performance are there.

But what niche does .NET provide outside being a language easily adoptable by retards?

[–] 0 pt

Perl, bash shell, C++, Forth, COBOL or GTFO (ok...Lua but only in your spare time)

vi editor or you are a gay scientist that works at NASA.