Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.3K

Are the absolute worst. .

.

(double space for mobile users' ease of clicking) But that's all people need to accept things. They are incapable of demanding, requiring or even requesting actual proof.

Are the absolute worst. [This is what the heading for my new text post looks like](https://pic8.co/sh/ftfdAL.png). [This is what it looks like now](https://pic8.co/sh/4MDoVm.png). (double space for mobile users' ease of clicking) But that's all people need to accept things. They are incapable of demanding, requiring or even requesting actual proof.

(post is archived)

[–] • 3 pts

Source?

Sorry. Couldn't resist.

[–] • 1 pt

kek I'd throw a current twitter thread up but I'm denying myself access to the timeline for lent.

[–] • 2 pts

These are the same people who use Schindler’s list as proof of the hollowcost

[–] • 2 pts

I can see the Venn Diagram.

[–] • 1 pt

TBF adding a tweet link along with the screenshot isn’t proof the content of a tweet is real either. It’s just proof that the tweet itself was real.

[–] • 1 pt

It is absent any * tweet was edited flag. Though, I suppose it's not necessarily proof, rather it's evidence but it's still better than,

hurrrrrrrrrrr here's a totally real screenshot!

[–] • 0 pt

That's why an archive link along with the original source added to the screenshot post is the way to go (unless the tweet has been deleted before someone archived it)..