Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

695

we should really play of that angle when it comes to gun rights.

"So they should of just let the nazis kill them?"

the can of the worms this one opens up

we should really play of that angle when it comes to gun rights. "So they should of just let the nazis kill them?" the can of the worms this one opens up

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

Few German citizens owned, or were entitled to own firearms in Germany in the early 1930s,[2] the Weimar Republic having strict gun control laws.[8] When the Nazi party gained power, some aspects of gun regulation were loosened, such as allowing firearm ownership for Nazi party members and the military.[5]:672 The laws were tightened in other ways. Nazi laws systematically disarmed "unreliable" persons, especially Jews, but relaxed restrictions for so-called "ordinary" German citizens.[5]:670,676 The policies were later expanded to include the confiscation of arms in occupied countries.[9]:533,536

hahahaha

[–] • 2 pts

The holocaust didn’t happen, you fucking yid. Jews don’t advocate for laws because they follow them. They advocate for laws for the goyim only. They follow their own laws, always.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

ffs i know that, the idea is to get them too look like idiots on the gun control debate.

Its just an angle to get them into a logical fallacy

[–] • 2 pts

By accepting their lies as the basis of your premise, you spread the propaganda they entail. The Holocaust did not happen, also you can’t take my guns. They’re not mutually exclusive.

[–] • 1 pt

all important jEws ran away, all those left were either active agents for the bolshewiks or were left as sacrifices to later shame germany into submission. 250.000 jEws died, and at first they had guns and had fought against the germans. but Germany won. SAdly, the jEwish media only ever tells what was done to the jEw, not WHY it was done to them...

[–] • 1 pt

This is a good idea, it won't work for long though, and it'll only work to shut someone down in an argument specifically about guns. I doubt you'll get much mileage out of it but it's a good angle.

[–] • 0 pt

Taking guns from kikes in The Spartacus League was counterterrorism that hardly qualifies as gun control.

[–] • 0 pt

No, because it still portrays jews as victims and might actually bring (((them))) closer together with gun right advocators conservatives. Conservatives have to be jpilled and not see (((them))) as allies.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

I just want to see what a jew protesting against guns would have to say about the jews having guns could of prevented the holocaust but restrictive laws prohibited them from owning guns, i think they would BSOD