WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

If you look throughout history, Jewish subversion is more of a symptom than a cause.

It's like a weak immune system. Yes technically this person is sick because of (insert illness here) but they never would've had that problem if they were actually healthy in the first place. So are we going to sacrifice all of our freedoms, morals, principals and way of like just so fat fucks don't get Covid or should we just tell them to get their fat ass on a treadmill and keep moving?

[–] 0 pt (edited )

Something just occured to me. You're wrong about National Socialism.

Let's forget historical NatSoc for a moment. Even though I think, that much of the mainstream-criticism either is bullshit or character assassination, when it comes to Hitler and National Socialism, I'm keenly away that both have their flaws. So let's pretend that I've said that NatSoc bad Hitler bad, and let's ignore historical accuracy.

See... What put westerners on their current trajectory is, that they thought that nazism bad hitler bad, and therefore they did everything they could to not be like nazis, up to the degree of this suicidal ridiculousness mixed with staunch defeatism we're encountering now.

All this tolerance-inclusion-embraceinferiority-pacifism-kikeworship is exactly what people deem to be the polar opposite of nazism. Nazis were strong, masculine, nationalistic, aggressive, militaristic, and so on, and that's bad, so let's do the polar opposite. Right? The modern disease tries to get as far away from nazism as humanly possible, precisely because it thinks, that hitler bad nazism bad. The media says this, politicians say this, society says this, and teachers in school said this, therefore it must be true.

If you want westerners to choose a better path, you can't let this stand, and expect them to somehow move into a different direction. You have to change the premises to expect people to come to different conclusions. When seen from their perspective, you want to convince them, to break with their current patterns of behavior and become more like nazis. And in order to achieve that, being a nazi has to be de-tabooized and must be made cool again.

Therefore: Hitler good, Nazism good.

I rest my case. Heil Hitler.

[–] [deleted] 0 pt (edited )

All this tolerance-inclusion-embraceinferiority-pacifism-kikeworship is exactly what people deem to be the polar opposite of nazism. Nazis were strong, masculine, nationalistic, aggressive, militaristic, and so on, and that's bad, so let's do the polar opposite. Right?

Well, there's a lot of truth to that. But traditional Christianity falls into that same category, and even some of the LESS subverted iterations of protestantism. Christianity has long been seen as the biggest threat to actual, self-proclaimed kike worshippers like Nietzsche long before National Socialism even existed. He wanted to unite Europe, and the Jews, against Christianity.

The enlightenment is still inherently Jewish subversion, it's biggest enemy is traditional Christianity, and National Socialism comes from the Enlightenment. So they are more like neighbors that hate each other than they are polar opposites. A prerequisite to viewing National Socialism as a polar opposite is to operate on their worldview in the first place. Only after you've accepted every premise of enlightenment thinking, every premise of the socialists, only then can you take the "opposite" stance of their arguments.

It's like pineapple on pizza, one says "I like it" and the other says "I hate it". Pepperoni isn't the opposite of pineapple. It's just the opposite stance within that framework. Nobody here is saying "I don't like pizza at all".

[–] 0 pt (edited )

Actually, I read quite a few of nietzsches books. It's been a while, but I think I remember, that he called christianity "first and foremost jewish" or something along those lines. Somewhere in the Antichrist. In the same book he called jesus to be honorable enough to see his own failings and refute his teachings, had he lived longer ;)

Anyways, you should quote his later books. His viewpoints changed over time. Beyond good and evil, genealogy of morals, and the antichrist are his most quoteworthy books, and of course the zarathustra, if you like prose.

In any case, it doesn't matter where National Socialism stems from. If people aren't in their right mind as the result of them not wanting to be nazis, the obvious therapy is to make them to want to be like nazis.

And of course the lemmings have no idea what nazis really were, so this whole exercise is disconnected from reality. People are stupid and live in their mass-hysterical imaginations, not in reality. There's no need for you to make sense, and put things in an historical or philosophical context, because it's just some mush in a bunch of lemming's heads. They're sick now, because they're so afraid of being nazis, that they become really, really stupid. From their perspective, becoming normal and healthy again is becoming like a nazi, and that's what they're afraid of. So make them become nazis, and they'll be healthy again.

Edit:

And after you've made them healthy with regards to National Socialism, you look in which way they're getting crazy next. I'd expect them wanting to be normal, appropriate, and so on, e.g. you'll have to make them unnormal and inappropriate as the next step on their journey of becoming healthy beings.

[–] 0 pt

Yeah, I like to keep things as simple as possible. A parasite would not exist in an enviroment that basically caters to it.