Faggots Adopt To Rape. [680x839 - 441KB] | Poal: Say what you want.

[–] • 9 pts

always has been the reason they adopt.

link

[–] • 2 pts

(edited )

Believe it or not, there was once a sane period in this country when being a faggot was an automatic diqualifier for adopting kids. Because every-fucking-body knew, beyond a shadow of a doubt, exactly what they'd do to those kids and the very thought of allowing, enabling or condoning it was vilified as evil.

Hell, just being an umarried man was an automatic disqualifier in itself because it was assumed that either, a) you were a faggot, or, b) if you were such an asshole no woman would have you, so why inflict you on kids?

We live in evil times.

parent
link

[–] • 7 pts

Letting children fall into the hands of these perverted monsters is Satanic in itself. They need to be wiped off the face of the earth.

link

[–] • 5 pts

I was against the gay marriage when it was going down back in 2000 or whenever it started. People asked why, and I told those buffoons, cuz it ain't gonna stop there. You know what.

I was right.

parent
link

[–] • 4 pts

(edited )

Yep.. I distinctly remember citing the slippery slope, as well. I mentioned pedos and beastiality being next. Most people said "c'mon, that's crazy."

Not a single fucking one of them has called to apologize yet.

What I find baffling is how anyone couldn't see it. It was so fucking obvious...

Now, do I believe all faggots are child predators? No, I don't. But, I also know how child predators are typically made: someone abused them. Well, I happen to believe that the vast majority of faggots were also abused in some way, which is why they are faggots to begin with. So, knowing that (or at least believing it on gut instinct), I have to think that the propensity of a faggot to also be a child molester is high..high enough that they shouldn't be allowed near children, much less to "parent" them.

I always said that faggotry and pedophilia are just different branches of the same tree..and I still believe that.

But at least with a true, pure faggot, they are only hurting themselves and other consenting adults. I think it's gross and all, but then if they want to do that and keep to themselves then that's one thing. But the "keep to themselves" condition is a hard line, and that line was transgressed long ago.

parent
link

[–] • 3 pts

💯 %

That's pretty much exactly how I felt then and now. I openly tell people now I'm sick of the rainbow and everything it represents. A buddy has two gay brothers.

parent
link

Load more (1 reply)

[–] • 1 pt

At this point I think we need to stop calling the slippery slope a fallacy and call it a law of nature.

parent
link

[–] • 5 pts

Consider the millstone and its value in the bronze age. The time and toil it took a group of masons to shape and smooth it from stone. Its value to the village, as it grinded grain into flour, making civilization stable with a source of staple. Now consider that the Highest command states it is better to use it to tie one to the neck of a faggot and drown them in the sea then let them be tempted and cause a child to stumble.

link

[–] • 5 pts

When you put it like that, I know I was right about the homos all along.

parent
link

[–] • 3 pts

Amen

parent
link

[–] • 1 pt

That's why you use the millstones that are worn beyond use and have been replaced. There's always a few of them laying around the mill. We used to use a few of them planted upright along the curved entrance to our driveway to keep people from cutting the corners and fucking up the grass, shrubbery, and flower beds planted out there. Good point anyway. Fuckers are heavy af.