WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

159

In a letter sent to the school, the VPA wrote, “Specifically, the school’s actions do not meet the expectations of the VPA’s 1st and 2nd policy, Commitment to Racial, Gender-Fair, and Disability Awareness and Policy of Gender Identity, respectively. Thus, Mid-Vermont Christian school is ineligible to participate in VPA activities going forward. The prorated dues will be returned to you via check.”

Somehow making girls play against a male is "Gender-Fair".

>In a letter sent to the school, the VPA wrote, “Specifically, the school’s actions do not meet the expectations of the VPA’s 1st and 2nd policy, Commitment to Racial, Gender-Fair, and Disability Awareness and Policy of Gender Identity, respectively. Thus, Mid-Vermont Christian school is ineligible to participate in VPA activities going forward. The prorated dues will be returned to you via check.” Somehow making girls play against a male is "Gender-Fair".

(post is archived)

[–] 2 pts

Frame it as a safety issue. A biological male is taller, heavier, and stronger than 99% of the girls. It's not safe to have them play a high contact sport like basketball.