Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

No such thing as attempted theft I guess.

edit: this post is about the gender sign.

No such thing as attempted theft I guess. edit: this post is about the gender sign.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (12).
[–] • 0 pt

Without using any government sources prove it is a ball.

[–] • 3 pts
[–] • 1 pt

Valiant effort. The first story does not meet my criteria. Released by the (((allies))) after the fact.

The second and third examples can easily be explained by lens distortion.

[–] • 2 pts

The second and third examples can easily be explained by lens distortion.

Nope. The lens distortion would be obvious on all objects. Like that does have lens distortion. Nice try though flatTard. Had you actually read anything you would know they used rectilinear lenses which are specifically designed to eliminate barrel distortion.

Now let's see some proof that it's flat. Video or image proof. Not some backyard DIY grade school experiment.

[–] • 0 pt

government sources

You first source is the us government. You second and third are fisheye lenses.

[–] • 2 pts

Tell me you can't read without telling me you can't read. nigger tier IQ