I have no doubt that if a scorecard had been kept over the last 40+ years, the veracity quotient of tinhatters would be so far ahead of the professional scoffers that they would need a Star Trekkie warpspeed engine to catch up. Conspiracy theorists have been on target a good 75% of the time, while the habitual doubters have been proven wrong as much (if not more). Retards like Amazing Randi and his cadre of silly skeptics are very much akin to slothful scientists that want to disprove the paranormal...without doing the painstaking work required by the Scientific Method to actually disprove it.
I have no doubt that if a scorecard had been kept over the last 40+ years, the veracity quotient of tinhatters would be so far ahead of the professional scoffers that they would need a Star Trekkie warpspeed engine to catch up. Conspiracy theorists have been on target a good 75% of the time, while the habitual doubters have been proven wrong as much (if not more). Retards like Amazing Randi and his cadre of silly skeptics are very much akin to slothful scientists that want to disprove the paranormal...without doing the painstaking work required by the Scientific Method to actually disprove it.
(post is archived)