Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

946

HN faggots argue against research showing increased use of arguments from muh feels reduces rationality, by arguing from muh feels

HN faggots argue against research showing increased use of arguments from muh feels reduces rationality, by arguing from muh feels

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

Hackernews is a fucking cesspool of derangement and hard-left, anti-white, racist, silicon valley insanity. Every person I like on there has been banned. Fuck them and fuck their entire audience.

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

They'll say "insightful " things without a shred of self awareness that they completely contradict themselves in their next sentence.

[–] • 0 pt

Ironic that you criticize the HN comments yet they offer arguments and evidence for their positions. Maybe the paper is right, and you're part of the problem.

[–] • 2 pts

yet they offer arguments

Arguments from muh feelz are still a logical fallacy

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

All the most consistent and logical arguments in those comments are at the very bottom, and they've been downvoted.

[–] • 1 pt

Interesting language analysis, but I disagree with the conclusion. Authors merely stating "conclude" or "determine" instead "believe" or "feel" doesn't prove they actually were any more or less rational or logical.

It actually does. The primary difference is first-person pronoun use versus reliance upon external factors, such as evidence of any kind. That shift indicates a trend towards narcissistic thinking and possibly isolation.

This was a flagged comment. They can't differentiate between their subjective feelings and objective reality