Ironic that you criticize the HN comments yet they offer arguments and evidence for their positions. Maybe the paper is right, and you're part of the problem.
yet they offer arguments
Arguments from muh feelz are still a logical fallacy
All the most consistent and logical arguments in those comments are at the very bottom, and they've been downvoted.
Interesting language analysis, but I disagree with the conclusion. Authors merely stating "conclude" or "determine" instead "believe" or "feel" doesn't prove they actually were any more or less rational or logical.
It actually does. The primary difference is first-person pronoun use versus reliance upon external factors, such as evidence of any kind. That shift indicates a trend towards narcissistic thinking and possibly isolation.
This was a flagged comment. They can't differentiate between their subjective feelings and objective reality
(post is archived)