So which is more likely, a painting recording an event which reflects the written record, or a supposedly common painting trope offered merely on a plea of authority? Which version is actually debunked? If you sude strictly with evidence, the debunked is debunked.
Well considering that the sun and moon aka the “shapes” were not depicted in that way until many hundreds of years after the fact and during relatively narrow range of time in which religious art was heavily focused on incorporating such motifs, and the fact that the actual design of the shapes are drastically different painting-to-painting, despite their relative positions being very consistent as you would expect from an artistic motif, I’d say it makes far more sense that the shapes are exactly what art historians say they are and not aliens. Unless of course you think the aliens came down hundreds of years later to inform the christian world of how they should be depicting the scene but were were really bad at describing the appearance of the sky objects.
You'll find much bullshit surrounds the topic you advocate. Such depictions were in fact commonly found. The depiction you describe only comes to us from pleas to authority. Self appointed "authorities." Nothing to see here, according to you. Lol. Thus your schizo ass reference actually does become relevant.
Bringing us full circle. You prefer baseless, self appointed subject matter experts who ignore documented history because it defies common explanation and no other reason. I prefer the facts. It really is this simple. But I also understand indoctrination combined with ignorance is hard to ignore. You understand there is much history which coincides...
Simple FACT is, endless paintings do in fact document observations of the people which directly contradict the so called experts, according to written records. That's a fact. Who do you believe? The people who were actually there, or people with an agenda who are equally and endlessly confirmed as simply making shit up to fit a narrative? You advocate the later. Whereby those in mainstream who reject the narrative literally destroy their career, regardless of supporting scientific evidence. That's not science, though you're welcome to continue to pretend it is. Me, I continue to side with facts, evidence, and the scientific process.
As I said, you chose to believe Jews, secret societies, and confirmed liars. I chose to follow the evidence as required by the scientific process.
Will also point out, you made assertions about my personal position which is also false. Alien doesn't have to mean extraterrestrial. It's already well established advanced civilizations at least on par with our current technology existed at least 13,000 years ago (pre-flood). Dictionary definition confirms that as "alien", but doesn't necessarily mean extraterrestrial.
The problem with people like you is you don't begin to realize just how profoundly ignorant you are of what's actually documented and supported by archeological evidence. Museums commonly have entire wearhouse filled with "out of place artifacts." These are common. Which means artifacts which destroy mainstream positions but are explicitly ignored because they destroy mainstream positions. These are the liars and self appointed experts you support.
It's already well established advanced civilizations at least on par with our current technology existed at least 13,000 years ago (pre-flood).
You want to provide any kind of source or proof of this? Or any of the other ridiculous claims you’ve thrown out to avoid actually engaging with this discussion? Almost everything you’ve said so far is the conversational equivalent of a kid saying “you didn’t hit me I have a laser shield that blocks all damage”.
You want to provide any kind of source or proof of this? Or any of the other ridiculous claims you’ve thrown out to avoid actually engaging with this discussion? Almost everything you’ve said so far is the conversational equivalent of a kid saying “you didn’t hit me I have a laser shield that blocks all damage”.
You can't argue with these people though I did throw out two posts on the absurd Ancient Aliens shit for one poster it seems there are more. As expected though, I even knew a few back before that show existed who would get really upset if you didn't accept their insanity.
As with everything you've stated, it's complete bullshit buffered with ignorance. The fact you believe otherwise without at least acknowledgment for the basis of my statements confirms you are completely and profoundly ignorant of anything and everything related to the topics in discussion. You are not a peer and it's unjust to demand I provide a remedial education so we can continue to pretend you're a peer. As you've made vey clear, facts or the evidence doesn't matter to you in the least.
If you want to learn, make an effort as I have done over the last many decades. Until you have anything other than your childish tantrums and ignorant demands I provide you an education, you have nothing to offer to discussions. Not in any way.
I'll now stress just how dishonest you are at demanding I provide you an education when you have yourself presented as being knowledgeable. Yet you also confirm you know absolutely nothing of alternative explanations, common history, or even extremely common topics, such as out of place artifacts.
At this point I will kindly request you fuck off until you make a good faith effort to learn anything relevant, covering the full spectrum of related positions and corresponding facts.
If in fact you're not a jew shill, then kindly fuck right off and begin searches on some of the named topics. Now you can at least pretend you want knowledge.
Or you can continue your jewish tactic, as you stated up front, of crying while lashing out. How very jewish of you.
In either case, no further crying is required on your part.
(post is archived)