My bird theory consists of 3 parts: a near weightless glider, an ideal dragless rope which hangs down from the glider, and a heavy man which can climb the rope as well as steer the glider.
The man begins at the bottom of the rope with the glider in a steady 100 fpm descent. He then climbs the rope at 200 fpm (relative to the rope). Since he is very heavy compared to the glider, the center of mass of the system ascends at 100 fpm thanks to his energy input. When he reaches the glider he releases the rope and allows the glider to zoom up very quickly, which it does effortlessly having very little weight of its own. He is in freefall for a bit but only loses a small amount of altitude compared with the amount of rope slipping up through his hands. He again grabs the bottom of the rope again and repeats the climb. In this way the system ascends at a constant 100 fpm using the man's climbing energy. The climb corresponds to the downstroke, the freefall to the upstroke. The man is the bird's body and the wings are the glider. If this model doesn't produce a vortex patter similar to a real bird I'd be very surprised.
Yea, except that's a maximally inefficient glider.
(post is archived)