In this scenario if you had free will you could call its bluff at some point. If things are deterministic they could be rigged so you could never do the right experiment to determine the true nature.
In this scenario if you had free will you could call its bluff at some point. If things are deterministic they could be rigged so you could never do the right experiment to determine the true nature.
The whole idea of free will is a nonstarter. Free will means to act contrary to the laws of nature. No such thing is possible.
The whole idea of free will is a nonstarter. Free will means to act contrary to the laws of nature. No such thing is possible.
Granted, but it's still useful to be able to make arguments within the opposition's self-imposed conceptual handicaps.
Granted, but it's still useful to be able to make arguments within the opposition's self-imposed conceptual handicaps.
Right premise. Wrong conclusion.
Free will can not exist in nature. Nonetheless, it exists.
Right premise. Wrong conclusion.
Free will can not exist in nature. Nonetheless, it exists.
(post is archived)