Birth control isn’t even necessary. I am married. We have kids and none were accidents. If we want a baby it takes about a month. Pregnancy is so easy to prevent without birth control. The issue isn’t that women need birth control to prevent pregnancy. They need to only sleep with their husbands. If they can’t have a baby bc of her health or other reasons that guy needs to be responsible enough to pull out. If he’s not why marry him? It’s a wife’s job to have kids. Sometimes you do need to prevent it though. I could’ve died from getting pregnant too quickly after a c section. Instead of having to poison myself my husband has self control. Then the next baby took 1 month of trying years later. Take that, ((pharmaceutical industry)).

The typical side effects of birth control make me wonder why women would ever take it to begin with. Birth control causes a woman's body to think it's pregnant, which leads to increased appetite, weight gain, mood swings, etc. It's not a secret.

So unnatural to pop pills to suppress hormones

Women carry the eggs they were born with , created in the womb. It makes sense that any female side effect would skip a generation as those eggs were created in the womb.

Hormonal birth control fueled the destruction of our civilization. It directly alters a females attraction profile. Three generations of malfunctioning female attraction has produced three generations of misaligned human reproduction. Abortion is the Christian third rail issue... It's an irrelevant consideration; don't want an abortion - don't have one. Hormonal contraception is a species level threat, passed as a harmless social good.

Does the normal human cycle return immediately, or is there a rebound effect where, even if ovulation occurs, the ambient hormonal background in the womb is screwed up?

Did the NIH really say "screwed up"? That doesn't sound like a technical term.

Also where's the evidence that there are more homosexuals than pre-hormonal BC, as opposed to they are more visible or they are more likely to identify that way? You'd want to look for actual behavior.

Some data: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-016-0769-4

The number of U.S. adults who had at least one same-sex partner since age 18 doubled between the early 1990s and early 2010s (from 3.6 to 8.7 % for women and from 4.5 to 8.2 % for men). Bisexual behavior (having sex with both male and female partners) increased from 3.1 to 7.7 %, accounting for much of the rise, with little consistent change in those having sex exclusively with same-sex partners.

and

Controlling for acceptance reduced, but did not eliminate, the increase in same-sex behavior over time

So do pedophiles

If psychiatrists actually had the well being of people in mind, amongst the scores of drugs they've developed they would produce 1 that would reduce homosexual tendencies. They've got shit for ADHD, OCD, depression, etc. Why not for gays? They're at far higher risks of getting incurable STDs, suicide, homicide, drug ODs, etc. It's a serious mental illness on par with the worst forms of schizophrenia, and yet... nothing. Instead, they've developed puberty blockers to destroy otherwise healthy children.

Interesting.

All the social conditioning aka grooming these kids get certainly does not help either.

It's tough to do, but they need to randomly sample several hundred heterosexual and homosexuals, interview their mothers, see if they used birth control, and also see how recently they used it from the time they got pregnant.