Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

This fellow breaks down what would be needed for an effective orbital DEW as well as the challenges that would need to be overcome.

Spoiler: Laser based weapons are doable but, he doesn't think this was done in Hawaii.

Personally, I'm not sure DEW was used in Hawaii but, I do know that the government is hiding something and likely have weapons tech beyond the parameters discussed here. The limitations however are due to the nature of the universe so even if the gov has better this video should still apply. The question becomes how did they overcome the limitations and to what degree.

This fellow breaks down what would be needed for an effective orbital DEW as well as the challenges that would need to be overcome. Spoiler: Laser based weapons are doable but, he doesn't think this was done in Hawaii. Personally, I'm not sure DEW was used in Hawaii but, I do know that the government is hiding something and likely have weapons tech beyond the parameters discussed here. The limitations however are due to the nature of the universe so even if the gov has better this video should still apply. The question becomes how did they overcome the limitations and to what degree.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (36).
[–] • 0 pt (edited )

Nope. Wrong again. I'm fully aware of what he spoke to via his ChatGPT bullshit. He completely ignores the facts as stated. The very purpose of my statement directly speaks to the convergence of a "beam" and the associated technology used to control it. It's literally the reason why these technologies exist. Him describing the cross sectional power distribution and so on is 100% completely irrelevant to anything stated. That's the problem. He then spewed tangential, irrelevant, bullshit with techno-babble. The fact he didn't even understand this is why it's very strong evidence he simply copy-pasted from ChatGPT. Him then coming in and describing physics of why the technology exists is stupidity to fool the foolish. He knows it. This is why be back peddled. He knows he was exposed and overplayed his hand.

Additionally, as is discussed in other threads, atmospheric distortion detection and correction is a decades old technology. Which means my statement remains correct, contrary to OP's and his.

What you don't understand is that I didn't engage on the physics discussion BECAUSE it's completely irrelevant to the very point I made. The fact he doesn't understand this is proof he's out of his depth. Which the guy in the video goes on to explain why I'm correct - albeit still somewhat incorrect on atmospheric issues. You see, once the atmosphere becomes energized, it actually pushes it out of the way, frequently creating plasma around it (these are very high energy levels), and allows for a precise signal to be placed on the beam (or another), using it as a carrier wave. The returned signals allow signal distortion analysis, for further beam confinement, beam steering, and so on. Accordingly, since the very purpose of a DEW is NOT a parallel beam (which idiot didn't understand and actively attempts to distort/hide/jabber around - thus the complete irrelevance of cross sectional distribution - in context). DEWs purposely use a convergent beam. Moron here even acknowledges this with mention of specific antenna technologies - which I had already topically addressed.

There's an old phrase. “If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullshit.” Congratulations, he just baffled you with bullshit. And successfully tricked you.

[–] • 0 pt

Does it irritate you that we live on a wet oblate spheroid rock with a pressurized atmosphere next to a vacuum?

I bet it does.

At any rate you'll be alright, just hang it there buddy. I'm sure you will be justified when we finally drill deep enough to hit turtle shell.

[–] • 0 pt

I politely responded to you and confirmed for you that he fooled you. Then you antagonize me?

Read the thread from the very top and pay close attention to how we got here. If you think I'm to blame you're not very smart.

I can't help that you're so easily impressed with bullshit. But it's not my fault. Seriously, take a close look at what transpired here.

"It's Easier to Fool People Than to Convince Them That They Have Been Fooled"

Hang in there. I hope you can learn to see through the bullshit in the future. Good luck.

[–] • 1 pt

Look dude, I like and agree with a lot of things you post, just not on this point. If you can't deal with someone thinking you are wrong it's not my problem. I'm not going to get into a word salad debate with you because you have done nothing but pull bullshit pseudoscience buzzwords out of your ass. You have repeatedly deflected, straw-manned, and circle jerked.

I don't have time for that shit, get over it and have a good day.