Who is claiming this? I'd like to talk shop with them in that case.
You should read the comments before you attempted to baselessly sandblast me. More information was provided which explains my line of thinking and position. Which further highlights the unfounded commentary you provided, in turn raising the question as to why you're doing so? Again, why the obvious ax and agenda?
I have read your commentary. The fact you claim I haven't implies either you misunderstood, didn't read mine, or are dishonestly pursuing an agenda.
There it is. Your projection implying I'm a Jew when you have been exposed using textbook Jew tactics. You basically just admitted you're a Jew shill. Read from the top. Read the other comments. My comments align with the video. Your attack of me from the very beginning, claiming I don't know what I'm saying while at the same time you backhandedly admitted not only do I know what I'm saying but it is in alignment with the guy in the video. You then claim he's wrong and confirm you've not bothered to read the other comments, whereby someone else here asserted this is his field. All of which confirms you're talking out of your ass at every turn. Accordingly, it's not unreasonable to push back against someone who:
- baelessly attacked me using non-contextual jabber-jargon which strongly implies you got it from ChatGPT
- Say he's wrong and right
- Say I'm wrong and right; therefor "supporting" I'm a Jew (I'm the attacked person here and sought nothing from you)
- claim it isn't his field while also acknowledging you didn't read the comments
- claim I didn't read the comments while you admitted you didn't
- continuously pilpill obvious bullshit while claiming victim status in an exchange/attack YOU initiated. Again, classic Jew attack/victim cries
So please, you're not fooling anyone.
If you don't want people to believe you're a subversive Jew, stop baselessly attacking people based upon purely subversive textbook jew tactics - including projection in your latest exchanges. It's sad. It's pathetic. It's transparent.
(post is archived)