WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

547

Let's assume a user has a debate with the owner of a YouTube channel, who can not handle criticism well and might delete comments.

Then, that user could ask for that conversation to continue on , where both parties can not censor each other.

Also, Poal.co, as a dedicated media aggregator and discussion platform, has a superior comment user experience compared to YouTube's Facebook-tier comment system.

Conversation threads on media aggregator platforms are easier to navigate through than YouTube comments.

Let's assume a user has a debate with the owner of a YouTube channel, who can not handle criticism well and might delete comments. Then, that user could ask for that conversation to continue on [Poal.co/s/Whatever](/submit/text/Whatever), where both parties can not censor each other. Also, Poal.co, as a dedicated media aggregator and discussion platform, has a superior comment user experience compared to YouTube's Facebook-tier comment system. Conversation threads on media aggregator platforms are easier to navigate through than YouTube comments.

(post is archived)

[–] 6 pts

yeah... but you're assuming a censorious cunt would agree to a level playing field. "Those who torment you will do so without end b/c they have the approval of their conscience."

[–] 2 pts

you're assuming a censorious cunt would agree to a level playing field.

If not, the participants knows he lost the debate.