Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

345

(post is archived)

[–] • 2 pts

You could always respond and ping whoever they're kvetching at.

[–] • 0 pt

Battle is battle even online. The person you criticize deserves to know you committed to war. Otherwise that's just groos dishonorable horse shit.

[–] • 0 pt

Yeah. That's why you should do that thing I said. If they ping whoever it is you wouldn't need to. As for making the site do that for them, it would be pretty pointless since the passive aggressive person in question could just misspell the other person's name.

[–] • 0 pt

Anyways a man declares his intentions and wins by acting immediately on them. A coward lies and relies on deception.

[–] • 0 pt

and anyone you'd choose to consult. I find that behavior dishonorable but i'm open to debate.

[–] • 0 pt

is there a way to add auto pinging even when referring to users as an abbreviation

[–] • 2 pts

Not possible and a waste of resources.

[–] • 0 pt

i don't mean necessarily abbreviating. But shouldn't criticism ping those you criticize?

[–] • 0 pt

Passive aggressiveness is disgusting behavior.

Does that also apply to people who block you? I can't ping because he blocked me for calling him out on some of the bullshit he spews that goes against his usual anti-jew stuff.

[–] • 0 pt

I've never been passive with ac and most my encounters with him were requested

[–] • 1 pt

I should have made it more clear that AC's blocking me was the passive aggressive behavior that is disgusting in my opinion. I can't ping him and my votes for him don't count/stick due to him blocking me. That's pretty lame and cowardly behavior.