I'm not arguing any of that. I've noticed his die hard protection of Trump and crew despite past evidence. My hesitation is I saw him more in the light of a QAnon follower than an outright subverter of the conversation. I know a lot of people who are still "on the Trump train" so to speak, and will defend everything he does like it's a personal attack on them.
But what do I know about anything? I'm just a toilet cleaning frog. Thinking isn't my forte.
Nah, it's fine. I elaborated more on my other reply to you. Honestly, AOU had a lot of patience with Lurker, this was just the final straw.
If what AOU said about the PMs is true, then absolutely. I remember when Budda got banned, and was shocked then also, until I saw him go to fagvoat and bash AOU with a similar argument of stiffing free speech because of a pedo apologist arguments
I've never had any issue with Lurker. It all started when he began to cheer the legal replacement of Whites and downplay pedophilia.