Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.2K

He openly claimed that the Epstein list was a psyop (when children have been trafficked and raped) and doubled down after I warned him about the .

Gatekeeping for pedophiles will get you instantly and permanently banned.

https://poal.co/s/PedosExposed/773899/ec4757a7-c436-45cb-b1f7-9019f8377ef3

https://poal.co/s/NewsoftheFucktards/771611/dd4a79a7-d2da-4af3-b302-83a237935e05#cmnts

He openly claimed that the Epstein list was a psyop (when children have been trafficked and raped) and doubled down after I warned him about the [ToS](https://poal.co/tos). Gatekeeping for pedophiles will get you instantly and permanently banned. https://poal.co/s/PedosExposed/773899/ec4757a7-c436-45cb-b1f7-9019f8377ef3 https://poal.co/s/NewsoftheFucktards/771611/dd4a79a7-d2da-4af3-b302-83a237935e05#cmnts
You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (36).
[–] • 5 pts

Lurker claimed to be a victim of harassment and his free speech was impeded when anyone called him out. He might as well openly have dared AOU to ban him. In fact, I called for his ban 17 days ago when he said the Epstein Client list was "an insignificant issue" because Trump told him to forget about it.

Yes, the largest pedophile ring and blackmail operation in THE ENTIRE FUCKING WORLD was "An insignificant issue" according to Lurker17.

[–] • 3 pts

Assuming someone believes every word that comes from Trumps mouth, then yeah, I could see someone realistically thinking "An insignificant issue", provided they were prepared to suspend critical thinking faculties. I guess I'm over thinking this whole situation cause I though Lurker was a cool enough dude to chat with.

[–] • 3 pts

He was, as long as you didn't start questioning him on MAIGA related topics