WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.3K

https://pleroma.nobodyhasthe.biz/main/all

https://discussions.app/

https://poa.st/

I don't know who owns these, but they all claim free speech.

https://pleroma.nobodyhasthe.biz/main/all https://discussions.app/ https://poa.st/ I don't know who owns these, but they all claim free speech.

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

Did you read the footnote to that bullshit claim?

18 USC 1466A. Note that according to a plain reading of the statute, that simple possession of virtual child pornography seems to be illegal if committed in the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States or in any territory or possession of the United States – even without proof of it being transported across state lines, transmitted through a common carrier, or in an amount indicated an intent to distribute.

Loli isn't child pornography. Nor is it "virtual child porn".

You're as bad as those faggots that get bent out of shape over "child" sex dolls. It's a fucking piece of plastic, but if you call it a "child" it's illegal, but if you say it's an adult in a school girls clothes, well, that's okay.

Pathetic.

[–] 1 pt

Regardless of how you view the legality... If you fantasize about children whether real, cartoon, or doll you are a sick fuck.

[–] -1 pt

What the fuck does being a "sick fuck" have to do with free speech? Do you know how many sick fucks post stupid assed shit all over the internet every minute of the day?

You going to pick and choose which sick fucks are allowed to post what? Then, claim muh free speech?