So, when it's going to be obvious that kikes are massively involved everywhere at "speech regulation"/censorship positions and editorial positions, they are going to justify censoring those pointing at that mere fact, by the fact that they are doing just that in the first place... See how that works? https://craigkeener.com/irony-and-figurative-language-inverted-guilt-in-acts-755-60/ >>Ancient rhetoricians commonly turned accusers’ own charges against them, a strategy both recommended in rhetorical handbooks and exemplified in preserved forensic speeches. Writers also employed this **inversion of guilt** to provide irony in other literary forms as well, for example claiming that it was Socrates’s accusers, rather than Socrates himself, who were truly guilty of the crimes of which they accused him. Ancient democrats...