This argument is so stupid, it's painful. You can't see stars in the daytime, either, right? Does that mean the stars are not there? No, it has to do with the way the eye works. Similarly, the cameras NASA used work in a certain way, and that way does not allow them to pick up the stars without washing out everything else.
This argument is so stupid, it's painful. You can't see stars in the daytime, either, right? Does that mean the stars are not there? No, it has to do with the way the eye works. Similarly, the cameras NASA used work in a certain way, and that way does not allow them to pick up the stars without washing out everything else.
You see the black background in the pics? That's 'space', which supposedly is full of stars and planets. Where are the lights?
You see the black background in the pics? That's 'space', which supposedly is full of stars and planets. Where are the lights?
No conception of the actual range of brightness they are working with, or the difference between the brightness of our local star vs the next nearest one 14 light years away.
No conception of the actual range of brightness they are working with, or the difference between the brightness of our local star vs the next nearest one 14 light years away.
And you have no concept of space supposedly being a VACUUM, there is no atmosphere to diffuse the light.
And you have no concept of space supposedly being a VACUUM, there is no atmosphere to diffuse the light.
(post is archived)