Never occurred to you that, the ultimate goal of the blatant section 230 abuse by the corporate world, might very well be, just that in the end? To force a repeal of section 230 altogether
From there, only "certified" content is allowed on any given platform, for obvious legal reasons... And who's going to engineer and control all that?
What about a public/private partnership, for a change? Sounds good right? /s
Like OS manufacturers have to comply and all, so we are all safe, the internet is safe, the content is clean and safe, everything is under control
>In this paper we discuss our experiences in implementing an operating system level DRM con-troller based on the GNU-Linux kernel. This paper investigates the feasibility of creating a trans-parent, application independent DRM controller and the performance implications thereof. Our investigation has revealed, that while a number of access control rules can be enforced transpar-ently at the operating system level, there are also a number of rules that require application level enforcement. Thus, we recommend separation of rights to two levels of enforcement to take advan-tage of transparent enforcement at the kernel level. Our performance analysis shows promise with no wall time impact. However, there is still a significant performance impact and improvements are necessary if DRM controllers are to be deployed in multi-user, high-load environments like file servers. Abstract In this paper we discuss our experiences in implementing an operating system level DRM con-troller based on the GNU-Linux kernel....
Hmmmm, what a great idea /s
(post is archived)