Yeah, most probably would say it sucked. I say 'decent' for it simply because I've seen a whole lot of horrible science fiction, so it was 'decent' by comparison. I consider that movie at about a 4 on a 10 scale. A 4 for most people probably equates to 'it sucks', but I consider a 4 for a scifi as being 'decent' considering most scifi I have seen barely gets to a 3. I've only seen a couple of scifi movies that I thought were good, let alone good enough to watch multiple times. I've also never rated any movie above 8 and even then I've only given that to maybe 2 or 3 films total across all genres. In The Cloverfield Paradox, several things in it not only didn't make sense, there was no logical reason for them to occur as they did and sometimes occurred opposite to what would be logical. It was likely an unfunded B scifi script that was dusted off and just had its ending changed for the Cloverfield tie-in to try to help pay for it even being made. It's a shame too as it could have been one of those rare scifi movies that are good if the writing were cleaned up with the intention of it being a Cloverfield movie from the beginning instead of being tacked on at the end and if things that happened made more sense instead of a mashup of weird, illogical things happening simply for the sake of being weird or for shock value. I wouldn't watch it again, but I don't think the ~1.5 hours or whatever I spent watching it that one time was a waste even with its issues. I won't watch 10 Cloverfield Lane again also, but it was a decent movie and I don't feel like that was a waste of ~1.5 hours or so either.