TIL that the plant known in Southern California as "Yucca", common in the high deserts and mountains there, is not actually a true yucca, but a species of a different, genetically distinct genus. [5184x3888 - 2.02MB]

Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

530

• (edited )

TIL that the plant known in Southern California as "Yucca", common in the high deserts and mountains there, is not actually a true yucca, but a species of a different, genetically distinct genus. [5184x3888 - 2.02MB] (pic8.co)

The taxonomy of H. whipplei is complex and controversial. Hesperoyucca was described as a genus by George Engelmann as long ago as 1892, but it has taken recent DNA analysis to confirm that they are genetically distinct from Yucca. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hesperoyucca_whipplei

Also, I learned that the Joshua Tree, which no one seems to ever call a yucca, really is a species of the genus Yucca (Y. brevifolus).

>The taxonomy of *H. whipplei* is complex and controversial. Hesperoyucca was described as a genus by George Engelmann as long ago as 1892, but it has taken recent DNA analysis to confirm that they are genetically distinct from Yucca. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hesperoyucca_whipplei Also, I learned that the Joshua Tree, which no one seems to ever call a yucca, really *is* a species of the genus Yucca (*Y. brevifolus*).

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.

Click here to see all the comments (8).

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

Weird. Also fuck deserts.

link

[–] • 1 pt

No liberals tho

parent
link

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

None in Appalachia nor the Ozarks either.

parent
link

[–] • 3 pts

Odd, one has to learn to live with the land, which seems to preclude liberals.

parent
link

[–] • 1 pt

City of Los Angeles is right over that ridge in this photo (less than 20 miles away), so really lots of liberals probably travel the road where it was taken.

parent
link

[–] • 0 pt

I’m talking deserts in general

parent
link