![Communism, no? (Acts 4:32-35) [1830x3573 - 798KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/HzP6uH.jpg){kind=link}
Bad link.
LMFAO I just told someone this is exactly what you'd do. You really have no idea what you are talking about, read the link again and this time try to understand what it says.
At its most basic, communism is a philosophy based on the equitable distribution of wealth among a nation's citizens and common ownership of all property. In particular, it called for the control of the means of production, such as manufacturing and agriculture, by the working class, or proletariat. Its ultimate goal was achieving a classless society, at which point the state (or government) would "wither away."
>Its ultimate goal was achieving a classless society, at which point the state (or government) would "wither away."
>Its ultimate goal was achieving a classless society, at which point the state (or government) would "wither away."
>Its ultimate goal was achieving a classless society, at which point the state (or government) would "wither away."
>Its ultimate goal was achieving a classless society, at which point the state (or government) would "wither away."
>Its ultimate goal was achieving a classless society, at which point the state (or government) would "wither away."
Basic political theory, kid. Socialism = strong state control Communism = no more state
I'll keep waiting for your apology.
It 404s you lying dumb fuck. But thank you for confirming your a lying, hypocritical, immoral, manlet.
As you don't know, here is the generic definition of socialism.
a political and economic theory of social organization which advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole.
Groups of people who subscribe to this are members of a commune. This is what OP describes. It's not communism. Communism requires government (aka, a centralized authority). Socialism does not.
Still waiting...
I'm waiting for you to learn you don't understand what socialism and communism is but I am not going to hold my breathe.
Its ultimate goal was achieving a classless society, at which point the state (or government) would "wither away."
I literally cut and paste the definition for you. That's not my words. That is the generic definition of socialism. Which you are dishonestly ignoring.
What makes your comment all the more idiotic is not only are you literally ignoring the definition right in front of your eyes, you're now asserting that the entire social and economic theory of socialism and communism (18th 19th century rollup) existed in biblical times. Never mind the definition you're idiotically attempting to hoist here is specific to state entities which doesn't even apply - and you're choosing all this over the definition literally right in front of your face. Profoundly manipulative and dishonest on your part.
Sorry dude, but you are only confirming you are extremely dishonest, arrogant, and dumb. You are a textbook Dunning-Kruger. Read the fucking definition you idiot.
If you're a man of any substance or character or morals, you'll apologize. But you won't.
a political and economic theory of social organization which advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole.
Now that we've confirmed you a lying, immoral, manlet, will you redeem yourself and apologize?
a political and economic theory of social organization which advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole.
Groups of people who subscribe to this are members of a commune. This is what OP describes. It's not communism. Communism requires government. Socialism does not.
Still waiting...
(post is archived)