![Communism, no? (Acts 4:32-35) [1830x3573 - 798KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/HzP6uH.jpg){kind=link}
Jesus died a virgin. Childless. Sacrificed himself to save the souls of others.
Muhammed was a warlord with many children.
Moslems, like their prophet, are fertile and aggressive.
Christians, like their prophet, are not having enough children and sacrifice themselves for the benefit of others.
Jesus rose from the grave, documented by over 500 people, including accounts of his resurrection in Roman documents and Jewish Talmud, in addition to the 4 gospels.
Mohammed is still dead.
Islamic Symbolism:
Christian Symbolism:
Christian's most prominent symbolism is not victory or aggression, it's suffering. No wonder in all Christian countries people bicker over who is suffering the most, who's the biggest victim, who's most orpressed. If there were swords and AK-47 in our churches, on our necklaces and on our walls instead of our prophet being stripped of his clothes, bleeding, in agony, perhaps we wouldn't have this disgusting victim and self-sacrifice culture.
Are you a Jew? Little you said is accurate. But you're repeating Jewish revisionism and lies very accurately. At best, you're a good student of the Jew's revisionism and platitudes.
You still have yet to address the fact that Jesus is alive, as reported by over 500 people and the Jews themselves that tried to kill him, while child fucker Mohammed is dead and bones. I'll trust the word of a living God
Jesus died a virgin. Childless. Sacrificed himself to save the souls of others.
Actually, the Church says that. Evidence says otherwise. Either case, we don't know if he was a virgin and there really isn't any reason to believe he was.
Virgin historically meant never having born a child , which means all men are virgins till death.
Words get twisted as time moves by....
Interesting. Never heard that before.
Thanks.
As far as I know the church argues that sex outside marriage is a sin, and jesus isn't a sinner.
Either way Christians aren't having enough children and are too self-sacrificial.
Part of that evidence is that he was married. Why do you only know what Jews says and nothing of the contentious parts of your very own argument?
(post is archived)