WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

480
[–] 5 pts

It's so it just might work?

Really though. Requiring "profit at all costs" has been a massive fuck-up over time.

[–] 4 pts

How about dropping requirements that corporations benefit anyone?

I'll go further, how about dropping the idea that corporations can have personhood?

[–] 2 pts

That is a recent court ruling. Previously, it had been ruled that corporations were not persons, therefore could not be legally pursued. Mike moore details that point in "Capitalism"

[–] 1 pt

I agree with the personhood idea too, who ever came up with that one must have had blackmail on all the fucking congressmen, cause who would agree that a corporation has the same rights as a person, at the same time being mandated by law to serve the shareholders only

[–] 1 pt

I agree, there are a bunch of changes that need to go with it though. If you only made that one change, then every business would have to be owned by one person or a group of people. While I am all in for suing the shit out of CEOs or other directors when they do something rotten and giving them no ability to just have the corporation pay a tiny fraction of the huge profits that were made, the first thing that would happen is kikes would just sue mom and pop shops into the ground, wiping out all competition. There would also need to be many reforms in the courts, the laws around share ownership etc.

[–] 2 pts

I admit I didn't think this all the way through, but yah, corporations shouldn't be able to shield malfeasance.

[–] 3 pts

Oy Vey! Cool it with the antisemitism, goy!

The rabbi hole goes even deeper >> https://poal.co/s/GoyimTV/661875

[–] 2 pts

Ahh shit. We triggered the "hand rubbing intensifies". (not intended to be sarcasm, just more) (((noticing))) is being (((noticed))).

I am tired, maybe that didn't come off right. "I agree" should suffice.

[–] 0 pt

I was not intending to be anti-anything with this post

I was intending to be pro-consumer, and pro-employee

but since you brought it up

I guess I am anti-semite, if anti semite means that I am opposed to the jew run foreign occupation government

if you refer anti-semite to me hating people who speak a semetic language, i don't give a fuck about them, they have no relevance to me, fuck 'em, they can do what they please where they are.

So yep, I am anti-semite. No semetic language allowed where I live.

[–] 0 pt

they have no relevance to me,

fuck 'em, they can do what they please where they are.

They do have a major relevance on how your life has been enslaved into their usury and rules.

[–] 1 pt

Most jews don't actually speak a semitic language though.

[–] 0 pt

usury is a sin, I do not participate in fraud or usury

[–] 1 pt

A main reason Ford did not want to pay the dividend was because the Doge brothers were using the money to start their own business.