Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

393

I want peoples shitty defense of both of them before I drop the MOAB of why they were the worst presidents of all time.

If you are anywhere on the right, by ideology and accomplishments Bill Clinton and Jimmy Carter were more right wing than either Reagan or Lincoln.

So let’s hear the defense for Lincoln (who faked his own death) and Reagan (a literal actor).

I want peoples shitty defense of both of them before I drop the MOAB of why they were the worst presidents of all time. If you are anywhere on the right, by ideology and accomplishments Bill Clinton and Jimmy Carter were more right wing than either Reagan or Lincoln. So let’s hear the defense for Lincoln (who faked his own death) and Reagan (a literal actor).

(post is archived)

[+] [deleted] • 1 pt
[–] • 0 pt

Both sodomized your mom. At the same time.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

If they were not good presidents then there also were not as many good citizens as we thought as well...I raise you a black pill.

[–] • 0 pt

The first red pill is realizing history is fake.

If I told you that 1,000 years of our history was added out of thin air you wouldn’t believe me and yet there is lots of evidence for it.

In this case I just want to know why “conservatives” like Lincoln and Reagan

[+] [deleted] • 0 pt
[–] • 0 pt

Who was a good president? Your favorite?

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

DPS told me that all government in inherently evil, so maybe that is a trick question. But if that is true the best president would be a reflection of the people as well.

[–] • 1 pt

The last time government reflected the people was during the monarchy (sounds odd however it’s true).

Before that it was Sparta (the longest democracy in history because they ruled by natural law for 1,000 years).

Democracy doesn’t work because the weak end up ruling the smart

[–] • 0 pt

I can't say I ever considered Abraham Lincoln to be a good president. The American civil war was totally unnecessary and resulted in nearly two million military casualties on both sides with an additional million slave and civilian deaths. However, I can understand why cowardly power hungry materialists would praise him. The U.S. Congress of the decades preceding provoked the war by treating the south like the federal piggy bank, by financing the development of Northern industry with southern agricultural exports.

As for Ronald Reagan I've no put much time and energy into examining his administration, but what little I've examined, it's clear that it was thoroughly infiltrated just as badly as any that came before or since by globalists.

You seem to have applied more scrutiny to American politics than I have. What are your thoughts on the idea of developing an American Nationalist Party?

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

Regan;

  1. Turned California blue through illegal immigration (which never ended)

  2. Started the Middle East wars that never ended

  3. Created no fault divorce and ended the family unit as we know it

  4. Gave amnesty to corporations to destroy our working class

  5. Wrote what would become NAFTA

Reagan was a shit President

Lincoln;

  1. Destroyed the constitution

  2. Destroyed states rights

  3. Declared war on state sovereignty

  4. Helped establish what would become the Federal Reserve (aka the IRS)

  5. Killed hundreds of thousands of Americans simply to make banks rich

The only good thing Lincoln had was emigration plans for after the illegal war against the South.

A nationalist party will happen and the only way to proceed from here. Democracy has died most people just haven’t noticed yet. There is good or evil and people need to pick a side

[–] • 0 pt

There’s a great biography called ) of Andrew Jackson that paints a perfect timeline that lead to the Civil War, I was shocked to read that the War almost occurred during Jackson’s presidency but he was able to post pone in for another 40 years.

The short of it is that America was levying a 90-% tax on southern cotton. That is what triggered the war. Had nothing to do with slavery as most cotton farms were family farms and not run by slaves