One reasonable explanation is that there is no virus
I'm not sure how you got to that conclusion. Would you mind explaining a little more?
Well, if the effect of disease transmission is independent of people having contact then it leads one to believe the tests are giving the same results whether or not any disease is transmitted. In other words, there is no disease but instead a test which give results with or without a disease.
Keep in mind, there are other reasonable explanations. Each one should be looked into and tested against.
if the effect of disease transmission is independent of people having contact
That's not what he's saying. Contact is required for it to spread. What the data seems to show is that regardless of how strict the isolation or how soon they start it, it still follows the same pattern.
I wonder how it would spread if everyone is in isolation though? This is what lead me to my conclusion.
It could be the month or two week gestation thing but why is it falling at the same rate regardless if people aren't in contact? I guess it could be by means (for example) through mail and people touching packages for delivery maybe?
And it begs the question, what is going on with these tests? And how are they determining a positive result?
Check this out: https://poal.co/s/conspiracy/163769
(post is archived)